How come you can assign an address to an integer variable like this,the complier will not give an error. i always though you can only assign integer values to a integer vari
You can also use *(int *)(Address) = value
as a construct to assigne a value
to Address
and use the answer by @Luchian Grigore
Because in any literal starting 0x is actually an integer. So it is allowed. An address is can sometimes be an integer.
0x28ff1c
is not an address itself - it's just a hexadecimal number.
The following are equivalent:
int a = 2686748; //decimal number
int a = 0x28ff1c; //hexadecimal number
int a = 012177434; //octal number
An address is represented by a pointer - if it's just that, an address, you can use a void*
:
void* p = (void*)0x28ff1c;
In which case
int a = p;
wouldn't compile. p
is an address, the number itself isn't.
The number 0x28ff1c
is just the hexadecimal (base-16) representation of the decimal (base-10) number 2686748
. As cout
defaults to printing decimal values for integers, that is probably the number you got printed.
The case with char b = 0x28ff1c
is slightly different, because
char
is not large enough to hold that value. The practical result is that it gets truncated to 0x1c
.cout
treats char
specially, because it is normally used to hold textual data, so cout
prints the character that has the code 0x1c
, which is some kind of control character. You could try it with 0x41
for example (which represents 'A'
in ASCII and UTF-8).And note that there is nothing that marks 0x28ff1c
as being an address. An address would be formed by &a
or (void*)0x28ff1c
.