python class methods and inheritance

后端 未结 3 2042
后悔当初
后悔当初 2021-01-18 18:28

I would expect the following code to print 012345 but it prints 012012. Why? I would expect the calls to incr to be accessing the same variables since they are inherited fro

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-01-18 18:34

    Both class b and class c inherit from class a separately, and var is set to 0 each time.

    One way to have class c to get the same value of var in class a as class b does, class c can inherit from class b like so:

    class a(object):
        var = 0  
        @classmethod
        def incr(cls):
            print cls.var
            cls.var+=1
    
    class b(a):
        def func(self):
            super(b,self).incr()
    
    class c(b):
        def func(self):
            super(c,self).incr()
    
    
    t = a()
    t1 = b()
    t2 = c()
    t1.func()
    t1.func() 
    t1.func()
    t2.func()
    t2.func()
    t2.func()` 
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-18 18:44

    There is a way to produce the sequence 012345. You have to make sure that the var of class a is increased in the incr method, even when it is called in the subclasses. To achieve this, increment by a.var += 1, not by cls.var += 1.

    As pointed out by the other answers, the var is also inherited to b and c. By using cls.var += 1 both subclasses increase their own var instead of a's var.

    class a:
        var = 0
        @classmethod
        def incr(cls):
            print(cls.var)
            a.var += 1
    
    class b(a):
        def f(self):
            super().incr()
    
    class c(a):
        def f(self):
            super().incr()
    
    cb = b()
    cc = c()
    cb.incr()
    cb.incr()
    cb.incr()
    cc.incr()
    cc.incr()
    cc.incr()
    
    cb.incr()
    cc.incr()
    

    Produces:

    0
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-18 18:53

    They are inherited from the same class, but the cls passed to the classmethod via super is the current class where the method was called from. super accesses the base class version of the method, but the cls for the call is the class where the super call was made.

    This is one of the subtle differences between doing:

    def func(self):
        super(c, self).incr() # same as a.__dict__['incr'].__get__(self, type(self))()
    

    and:

    def func(self):
        a.incr()
    

    You can confirm this by printing the current cls in your incr method in both cases:

    def incr(cls):
        print cls
        ...
    

    You should never assume that all super does is make a method call bound to the parent class. It does a lot more.

    Keep in mind that when the first augmented assignment += is performed, the initial value of var is read from the base class (since at this point it does not exist in the dict of the subclasses). The updated value is however written to the subclass. Calling super from the second subclass repeats the same behavior of reading the initial var value from a.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题