Find the shortest path with the least number of edges

前端 未结 5 453
渐次进展
渐次进展 2021-01-18 07:48

I need to modify Dijkstra\'s algorithm so that if there are several shortest paths I need to find the one with minimum number of edges on the path.

I\'ve been stuck

相关标签:
5条回答
  • 2021-01-18 08:05

    Maintain minPathLen field for each vertex for dijktra.

    And in loop where you compare

       if(distance(s,u)+edge(u,v)<distance(s,v)) {
    
             distance(s,v) = distance(s,u) + edge(u,v)
             parent(v) = u
             // Add this statement
             minPathLen(v) = minPathLen(u) + 1
       }
    

    Add another statement:-

     if((distance(s,u)+egde(u,v)==distance(s,v))&&(minPathLen(u)+1<minPathLen(v))) {
    
           parent(v) = u
           minPathLen(v) = minPathLen(u) + 1     
    
       }
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-18 08:07

    Another option would be to add some small number ε to the weight of every edge, where ε << edgeWeights (for integer edge-weights you can choose ε < gcd(edgeWeights)/numberOfEdges)

    The advantage of this approach is that you don't need to write your own pathfinder, you can just use any off-the-shelf implementation.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-18 08:10

    We can add a very small value (let say ε) to each edge . Now the path that will have a higher number of edges will have a higher cost than the path that have lesser number of edges whereas both path had equal minimum path length.

    But we need to be careful about choosing such small value, as let's say there was a path that had a higher cost previously, but a lesser number of edges, then after this value modification a previously shorter path can end up having a higher value as the number of ε added to it is higher .

    To solve this problem we take the difference between 2 smallest edges . and divide that value by the number of edges to get ε.

    Proof - Let's say the graph has n edges. And it’s the shortest path contains (n-1) edges which is slightly high (this value will at least be the difference between 2 minimum edge ) than another path having just 1 edge. So after adding ε to all the edges, the minimum path is still minimum as at least (n+1) epsilon to make it longer than the other path, but it just has (n-1) ε. After value modification apply Dijkstra's algo to find the shortest path between s and t.

    Complexity = Complexitytomodifyvalue+ComplexityofDijkstra's = O(E+ E lg V ) = O(E lg V )

    Here is the python code -

    from heapq import heappop, heappush
    from collections import defaultdict
    
    
    def createAdjacencyList(Graph,epsilon=0):
        AdjacencyList = defaultdict(list)
        for Node1, Node2, edgeCost in Graph:
            AdjacencyList[Node1].append((edgeCost + epsilon, Node2))
        return AdjacencyList
    
    
    def bestShortestPath(epsilon, s, t, Graph):
        processingQ, visited = [(0, s, "")], set()
        while processingQ:
            # Always return the list item with min cost.
            (totalCost,thisVertices,path) = heappop(processingQ)
            if thisVertices not in visited:
                visited.add(thisVertices)
                path = path + thisVertices
                if thisVertices == t:
                    return totalCost - ((len(path) - 1) * epsilon), path
    
                for thisCost, connectedVertices in Graph.get(thisVertices, ()):
                    if connectedVertices not in visited:
                        # It's a python inbuilt Heap. Whenever we will do POP , we will get the element with MinCost .
                        heappush(processingQ, (totalCost+thisCost, connectedVertices, path))
    
        return float("inf")
    
    if __name__ == "__main__":
        Graph = [ ("A", "B", 3), ("B", "C", 7), ("C", "D", 8),("D", "E", 2), ("E", "F", 3),
                  ("A", "G", 7), ("B", "G", 6), ("A", "K", 7), ("C", "I",3), ("F", "K", 9),
                  ("G", "H", 4), ("H", "I", 2), ("K", "J", 1), ("G", "L",4), ("I", "M", 3),
                  ("I", "O", 3), ("J", "N", 7), ("L", "M", 6), ("M", "N", 7), ("L", "O", 6),
                  ("M", "O", 1), ("N", "O", 1), ("L", "H", 1), ("M", "E", 3), ("O", "A", 2),
                  ("O", "B", 1), ("O", "C", 1), ("O", "D", 1), ("O", "E", 1), ("K", "N", 8),
        ]
        #  value of epsilon is minimumEdgeWeight/totalNumberOfEdges added to each edge
        minEdge = min(Graph, key=lambda t: t[2])[2]
        secondMinEdge = min(Graph, key=lambda t: [t[2], float("inf")][t[2] == minEdge])[2]
        epsilon = (secondMinEdge - minEdge)/ len(Graph)
        print(createAdjacencyList(Graph).items())
        Graph = createAdjacencyList(Graph, epsilon)
        # (16.0, 'AKNO')  . Though multiple path exists with value 16.0 like ABCIO,AKJNO
        print("Cost and Path from A -> O: is ", bestShortestPath(epsilon, "A", "O", Graph))
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-18 08:17

    Instead of assigning every node with the distance from source you can assign the number of edges traversed so far also. So each node will have (distance,edges) instead of distance only. Everything else works as usual and for every terminal node you record the one with minimum value of (distance,edges).

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-18 08:22

    inspired by BlueRaja

    public void updateAdjacencyMatrix()
    {
            epsilon = 0.001
            for (int i = 0; i < size; i++)
            {
                for (int j = 0; j < size; j++)
                {
                if (adjacencyMatrix[i, j] != 0)
                    adjacencyMatrix[i, j] = adjacencyMatrix[i, j] + epsilon;
            }
        }
    }
    

    then call updateAdjacencyMatrix() in your normal Dijkstra's implementation

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题