I am trying to implement a simple stack with Python using arrays. I was wondering if someone could let me know what\'s wrong with my code.
class myStack:
class Stack:
s =[]
def push(self, num):
self.s.append(num)
def pop(self):
if len(self.s) == 0: # erro if you pop an empty list
return -1
self.s.remove(self.s[-1])
def isEmpty(self):
if len(self.s) == 0:
return True
else:
return False
def display(self): # this is to display how a stack actually looks like
if self.isEmpty():
print("Stack is Empty")
for i in range(len(self.s)-1,-1,-1): # I haven't used reversed() since it will be obv
print(self.s[i])
obj = Stack()
obj.push(3)
print(obj.isEmpty())
obj.push(4)
obj.display()
print("----")
obj.pop()
obj.display()
Assigning to self
won't turn your object into a list (and if it did, the object wouldn't have all your stack methods any more). Assigning to self
just changes a local variable. Instead, set an attribute:
def __init__(self):
self.stack = []
and use the attribute instead of just a bare self
:
def push(self, item):
self.stack.append(item)
Also, if you want a stack, you want pop()
rather than pop(0)
. pop(0)
would turn your data structure into a(n inefficient) queue.
A stack is a container (linear collection) in which dynamic set operations
are carried out as per the last-in first-out (LIFO) principle.
There is only one pointer - top
, which is used to perform these operations
CLRS implementation of stack using array:
class Stack:
"""
Last in first out (LIFO) stack implemented using array.
"""
def __init__(self, capacity=4):
"""
Initialize an empty stack array with default capacity of 4.
"""
self.data = [None] * capacity
self.capacity = capacity
self.top = -1
def is_empty(self):
"""
Return true if the size of stack is zero.
"""
if self.top == -1:
return True
return False
def push(self, element):
"""
Add element to the top.
"""
self.top += 1
if self.top >= self.capacity:
raise IndexError('Stack overflow!')
else:
self.data[self.top] = element
def pop(self):
"""
Return and remove element from the top.
"""
if self.is_empty():
raise Exception('Stack underflow!')
else:
stack_top = self.data[self.top]
self.top -= 1
return stack_top
def peek(self):
"""
Return element at the top.
"""
if self.is_empty():
raise Exception('Stack is empty.')
return None
return self.data[self.top]
def size(self):
"""
Return the number of items present.
"""
return self.top + 1
Testing the implemetation:
def main():
"""
Sanity test
"""
stack = Stack()
print('Size of the stack is:', stack.size())
stack.push(3)
print('Element at the top of the stack is: ', stack.peek())
stack.push(901)
print('Element at the top of the stack is: ', stack.peek())
stack.push(43)
print('Element at the top of the stack is: ', stack.peek())
print('Size of the stack is:', stack.size())
stack.push(89)
print('Element at the top of the stack is: ', stack.peek())
print('Size of the stack is:', stack.size())
#stack.push(9) # Raises IndexError
stack.pop()
print('Size of the stack is:', stack.size())
stack.pop()
print('Size of the stack is:', stack.size())
stack.pop()
print('Size of the stack is:', stack.size())
print('Element at the top of the stack is: ', stack.peek())
stack.pop()
#print('Element at the top of the stack is: ', stack.peek()) # Raises empty stack exception
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
I left a comment with the link to http://docs.python.org/2/tutorial/datastructures.html#using-lists-as-stacks, but if you want to have a custom type that gives you push
, pop
, is_empty
, and size
convenience methods, I'd just subclass list
.
class Stack(list):
def push(self, item):
self.append(item)
def size(self):
return len(self)
def is_empty(self):
return not self
However, as I said in the comments, I'd probably just stick with a straight list
here, as all you are really doing is aliasing existing methods, which usually only serves to make your code harder to use in the long run, as it requires people using it to learn your aliased interface on top of the original.
Your problem is that you're popping from the beginning of the list, when you should be popping from the end of the list. A stack is a Last-In First-Out data structure, meaning that when you pop something from it, that something will be whatever you pushed on last. Take a look at your push function - it appends an item to the list. That means that it goes at the end of the list. When you call .pop(0), however, you're removing the first item in the list, not the one you last appended. Removing the 0 from .pop(0) should solve your problem.
I would like to share my version of the stack implementation that inherits Python List. I believe iteration on a stack should be happening in LIFO order. Additionally, an iteration on pop-all()
should be provided to iterate while poping all elements. I have also added stack.clear()
to empty a stack (like we have in deque.clear() in collections module). I have also override __repr__
for debugging purpose:
class Stack(list):
def push(self, item):
self.append(item)
def top(self):
return self[-1]
def size(self):
return len(self)
def isempty(self):
return self.size() == 0
def __iter__(self):
""" iter in lifo """
return super(Stack, self).__reversed__()
def __reversed__(self):
return super(Stack, self).__iter__()
def popall(self):
try:
while True:
yield self.pop()
except IndexError:
pass
def clear(self):
del self[:]
def __repr__(self):
if not self:
return '%s()' % self.__class__.__name__
return '%s(%s)' % (self.__class__.__name__, super(Stack, self).__repr__())
Here is how you can use it:
stack = Stack(range(5))
print "stack: ", stack # stack: Stack([0, 1, 2, 3, 4])
print "stack.pop() => ", stack.pop() # stack.pop() => 4
print "stack.push(20) " # stack.push(20)
stack.push(20)
for item in stack:
print item # prints 20, 3, 2... in newline
print "stack: ", stack # stack: Stack([0, 1, 2, 3, 20])
print "stack pop all..."
for item in stack.popall(): # side effect to clear stack
print item
print "stack: ", stack # stack: Stack()
Primary, I implemented it to use to solve a programming problem next greater element.