When I have some function that uses variables from its enclosing scope(s) and use that function outside of this scope (these scopes), then this is called a closure.
I'm mostly interested into whether there is some kind of specification for these cases
The ECMAScript specification does not really detail this. It simply says that a function closes over the whole lexical environment which includes all variables in all parent scopes, organised in so-called environment records.
Yet it does not specify how an implementation should do garbage-collection - so engines do have to optimise their closures themselves - and they typically do, when they can deduce that some "closed over" variable is never needed (referenced). Specifically, if you do use eval
anywhere in the closure, they cannot do that of course, and have to retain everything.
not so much about the behavior of some specific implementation
Regardless, you'll want to have a look at How JavaScript closures are garbage collected, garbage collection with node.js, About closure, LexicalEnvironment and GC and How are closures and scopes represented at run time in JavaScript
The scope chain of a nested function contains references to activation objects of all outer functions whose execution resulted in definition of the nested function. These activation objects store ALL values in place when the outer function call returned and continue to exist because they are in a scope chain.
So a closure, by definition, captures ALL variable values in scope. eval("typeof bigGuy");
within 'function () { /* CONTENTS */ } should demonstrate this.
The ECMA standards probably* cover this (if you are writing a javascript engine and have the time). A solution may be to set large sized variables to undefined
when their value is no longer required.