I have a DataGrid bound to an ICollectionView in my ViewModel. The DataGrid is inside a UserControl which is used in a few different data scenarios, some of which require ce
You can't do this. Binding/name resolution doesn't work this way. Why not, instead of a StringToVisibilityConverter
create a CollectionToVisibilityConverter
which examines the data source (possibly passing in the column/property to examine), looks to see if that column/property is completely empty, and then convert that to a Visibility?
I read somewhere on Stack Overflow(can't find exact post) that the DataGridColumn's aren't assigned a data context because they aren't a FrameworkElement. To get around this, I had to use code similiar to this:
<DataGridTemplateColumn
Header="Groups"
Width="*"
CanUserSort="True"
SortMemberPath="Groups"
Visibility"{Binding RelativeSource={x:Static RelativeSource.Self},
Path=(FrameworkElement.DataContext).IsGroupsVisible,
Converter={StaticResource booleanToVisiblityConverter}}">
<DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Label Name="lbl" Content="{Binding Path=Groups}" />
</DataTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn>
Where
<UserControl.Resources>
<BooleanToVisibilityConverter x:Key="booleanToVisibilityConverter" />
</UserControl.Resources>
To use RelativeSource.Self
as a RelativeSource
binding for a DataGridTemplateColumn
- you need to add the DataGridContextHelper to your application. This is still required for the WPF 4 DataGrid.
<DataGridTemplateColumn
Header="Groups"
Width="*"
CanUserSort="True"
SortMemberPath="Groups"
Visibility"{Binding RelativeSource={x:Static RelativeSource.Self},
Path=(FrameworkElement.DataContext).IsGroupsVisible,
Converter={StaticResource booleanToVisiblityConverter}}">
<DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Label Name="lbl" Content="{Binding Path=Groups}" />
</DataTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn>
This would be better achieved going through the Groups
property on the ViewModel; since that is ultimately what the Label
is using anyways.
<DataGridTemplateColumn Header="Groups" Width="*" CanUserSort="True" SortMemberPath="Groups" Visibility="{Binding Groups, Converter={StaticResource SomeConverter}}">
<DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Label Name="lbl" Content="{Binding Path=Groups}" />
</DataTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn.CellTemplate>
</DataGridTemplateColumn>
One hundred thanks to SliverNinja and this article DataGridContextHelper. Links to source code already not working and was not able download, so i wrote my own Attached Proeprty to make it work for all possible cases (DataContext changed, Attached Property value changed, Column added)
My application use DataGrid with AutoGenerateColumns=False and use DataGridTemplateColumn, so DataContext was set before columns added to grid.
Here is Attached Property class:
public sealed class DataGridColumnDataContextForwardBehavior
{
private DataGrid dataGrid = null;
public DataGridColumnDataContextForwardBehavior(DataGrid dataGrid)
{
this.dataGrid = dataGrid;
dataGrid.Columns.CollectionChanged += DataGridColumns_CollectionChanged;
}
private void DataGridColumns_CollectionChanged(object sender, System.Collections.Specialized.NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
var IsDataContextForwardingEnabled = GetIsDataContextForwardingEnabled(dataGrid);
if (IsDataContextForwardingEnabled && dataGrid.DataContext != null)
{
if (e.Action == NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add)
{
foreach (DataGridColumn column in e.NewItems)
{
column.SetValue(FrameworkElement.DataContextProperty, dataGrid.DataContext);
}
}
}
}
static DataGridColumnDataContextForwardBehavior()
{
FrameworkElement.DataContextProperty.AddOwner(typeof(DataGridColumn));
FrameworkElement.DataContextProperty.OverrideMetadata(typeof(DataGrid),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(null, FrameworkPropertyMetadataOptions.Inherits, new PropertyChangedCallback(OnDataContextChanged)));
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty IsDataContextForwardingEnabledProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("IsDataContextForwardingEnabled", typeof(bool), typeof(DataGridColumnDataContextForwardBehavior),
new FrameworkPropertyMetadata(false, OnIsDataContextForwardingEnabledChanged));
public static void OnDataContextChanged(DependencyObject obj, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
DataGrid dataGrid = obj as DataGrid;
if (dataGrid == null) return;
var IsDataContextForwardingEnabled = GetIsDataContextForwardingEnabled(dataGrid);
if (IsDataContextForwardingEnabled)
{
foreach (DataGridColumn col in dataGrid.Columns)
{
col.SetValue(FrameworkElement.DataContextProperty, e.NewValue);
}
}
}
static void OnIsDataContextForwardingEnabledChanged(DependencyObject obj, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
var dataGrid = obj as DataGrid;
if (dataGrid == null) return;
new DataGridColumnDataContextForwardBehavior(dataGrid);
if (!(e.NewValue is bool)) return;
if ((bool)e.NewValue && dataGrid.DataContext != null)
OnDataContextChanged(obj, new DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs(FrameworkElement.DataContextProperty, dataGrid.DataContext, dataGrid.DataContext));
}
public static bool GetIsDataContextForwardingEnabled(DependencyObject dataGrid)
{
return (bool)dataGrid.GetValue(IsDataContextForwardingEnabledProperty);
}
public static void SetIsDataContextForwardingEnabled(DependencyObject dataGrid, bool value)
{
dataGrid.SetValue(IsDataContextForwardingEnabledProperty, value);
}
}
Another non obvious things is how to properly use binding for DataGridTemplateColumn:
<DataGrid bhv:DataGridColumnDataContextForwardBehavior.IsDataContextForwardingEnabled="True">
<DataGrid.Columns>
<DataGridTemplateColumn Visibility="{Binding Path=DataContext.Mode, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}, Converter={StaticResource SharedFilesModeToVisibilityConverter}, ConverterParameter={x:Static vmsf:SharedFilesMode.SharedOut}}"/>
It is important to use Path=DataContext.MyProp and RelativeSource Self
Only thing i don't like in current implementation - to handle DataGrid.Columns.CollectionChanged event i create instance of my class and do not keep reference for it. So in theory GC may kill it within the time, not sure how to handle it correctly at present moment, will think on it and update my post later. Any ideas and critique are welcome.