I have a very big CSV file (tens of Gigas) containing web logs with the following columns: user_id
, time_stamp
, category_clicked
. I ha
Here's a soln for scaling this problem arbitrarily. This is in effect a high-density version of this question here
Define a function to hash a particular group value to a smaller number of groups. I would design this such that it divides your dataset into in-memory manageable pieces.
def sub_group_hash(x):
# x is a dataframe with the 'user id' field given above
# return the last 2 characters of the input
# if these are number like, then you will be sub-grouping into 100 sub-groups
return x['user id'].str[-2:]
Using the data provided above, this creates a grouped frame on the input data like so:
In [199]: [ (grp, grouped) for grp, grouped in df.groupby(sub_group_hash) ][0][1]
Out[199]:
user id timestamp category
0 20140512081646222000004-927168801 20140722 7
3 20140512081646222000004-927168801 20140724 1
with grp
as the name of the group, and grouped
as resultant frame
# read in the input in a chunked way
clean_input_reader = read_csv('input.csv', chunksize=500000)
with get_store('output.h5') as store:
for chunk in clean_input_reader:
# create a grouper for each chunk using the sub_group_hash
g = chunk.groupby(sub_group_hash)
# append each of the subgroups to a separate group in the resulting hdf file
# this will be a loop around the sub_groups (100 max in this case)
for grp, grouped in g:
store.append('group_%s' % grp, grouped,
data_columns=['user_id','timestamp','category_clicked'],
min_itemsize=15)
Now you have a hdf file with 100 sub-groups (potentially less if not all groups were represented), each of which contains all of the data necessary for performing your operation.
with get_store('output.h5') as store:
# all of the groups are now the keys of the store
for grp in store.keys():
# this is a complete group that will fit in memory
grouped = store.select(grp)
# perform the operation on grouped and write the new output
grouped.groupby(......).apply(your_cool_function)
So this will reduce the problem by a factor of 100 in this case. If that is not sufficient, then simply increase the sub_group_hash to make more groups.
You should strive for a smaller number as the HDF5 works better (e.g. don't make 10M sub_groups that defeats the purpose, 100, 1000, even 10k is ok). But I think 100 should prob work for you, unless you have a very wild group density (e.g. you have massive numbers in a single group, while very few in other groups).
Note that this problem then scales easily; you could store the sub_groups in separate files if you want, and/or work on them separately (in parallel) if necessary.
This should make your soln time approx O(number_of_sub_groups)
.