I\'m trying to write a functional approach in scala to get a list of all numbers between 1 & 1000 that are divisible by 3 or 5
Here is what I have so far :
Looks like Brian beat me to it :)
Just thought I'd mention that a Stream might be more preferable here for better performance:
val x = (1 until 1000).toStream //> x : scala.collection.immutable.Stream[Int] = Stream(1, ?)
x filter (t=>(t%3==0)||(t%5==0)) //> res0: scala.collection.immutable.Stream[Int] = Stream(3, ?)
Here's how I would do it with a for
expression.
for( i <- 1 to 1000 if i % 3 == 0 || i % 5 == 0) yield i
This gives:
scala.collection.immutable.IndexedSeq[Int] = Vector(3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 21...
Here's another approach filtering on a Range
of numbers.
scala> 1 to 1000
res0: scala.collection.immutable.Range.Inclusive = Range(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10...
scala> res0.filter(x => x % 3 == 0 || x % 5 == 0)
res1: scala.collection.immutable.IndexedSeq[Int] = Vector(3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 12, 15, 18, 20, 21...
If you really want a List
on the return value use toList
. e.g. res0.toList
.
(Range(3, 1000, 3) ++ Range(5, 1000, 5)).toSet.toList.sorted
Sorted can be omitted.
The problem from projecteuler.net also wants a sum of those numbers at the end.
"Find the sum of all the multiples of 3 or 5 below 1000."
object prb1 {
def main(args: Array[String]) {
val retval = for{ a <- 1 to 999
if a % 3 == 0 || a % 5 == 0
} yield a
val sum = retval.reduceLeft[Int](_+_)
println("The sum of all multiples of 3 and 5 below 1000 is " + sum)
}
}
The correct answer should be 233168
No any answer without division or list recreation. No any answer with recursion.
Also, any benchmarking?
@scala.annotation.tailrec def div3or5(list: Range, result: List[Int]): List[Int] = {
var acc = result
var tailList = list
try {
acc = list.drop(2).head :: acc // drop 1 2 save 3
acc = list.drop(4).head :: acc // drop 3 4 save 5
acc = list.drop(5).head :: acc // drop 5 save 6
acc = list.drop(8).head :: acc // drop 6 7 8 save 9
acc = list.drop(9).head :: acc // drop 9 save 10
acc = list.drop(11).head :: acc // drop 10 11 save 12
acc = list.drop(14).head :: acc // drop 12 13 14 save 15
tailList = list.drop(15) // drop 15
} catch {
case e: NoSuchElementException => return acc // found
}
div3or5(tailList, acc) // continue search
}
div3or5(Range(1, 1001), Nil)
EDIT
scala> val t0 = System.nanoTime; div3or5(Range(1, 10000001), Nil).toList;
(System.nanoTime - t0) / 1000000000.0
t0: Long = 1355346955285989000
res20: Double = 6.218004
One of answers that looks good to me:
scala> val t0 = System.nanoTime; Range(1, 10000001).filter(i =>
i % 3 == 0 || i % 5 == 0).toList; (System.nanoTime - t0) / 1000000000.0
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Another one:
scala> val t0 = System.nanoTime; (Range(1, 10000001).toStream filter (
(t: Int)=>(t%3==0)||(t%5==0))).toList ; (System.nanoTime - t0) / 1000000000.0
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
First one:
scala> val t0 = System.nanoTime; (for( i <- 1 to 10000000 if i % 3 == 0 ||
i % 5 == 0) yield i).toList; (System.nanoTime - t0) / 1000000000.0
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
Why Scala does not optimize for example Vector -> List?
another aproach:
(1 to 1000).filter(i => i % 3 == 0 || i % 5 == 0)