Can you create a std::map of inherited classes?

Question

I\'m wondering if it\'s possible to create a map of pointers of inherited classes. Here\'s an example of what I\'m trying to do:

#include 
#inc         


        

Answer 1

Yes you can store inherited classes in map, but pointers to them, not objects themselves. Here's a short example (it lacks memory management on pointers)

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <map>
#include <utility>

using namespace std;

class BaseClass
{
    string s;
public: 
    BaseClass() { s = "BaseClass";} 
    virtual void print() 
    {
        cout << s << std::endl;
    }
};

class Derived1 : public BaseClass
{
    int i;
public:
    Derived1() { i = 10; }
    void print() 
    {
        cout << i << std::endl;
    }

};

class Derived2 : public Derived1
{
    float f;
public:
    Derived2() { f = 4.3;}
    void print() 
    {
        cout << f << std::endl;
    }
};

int main()
{
    map<string, BaseClass*>m;
    m.insert(make_pair("base", new BaseClass()));
    m.insert(make_pair("d1", new Derived1()));
    m.insert(make_pair("d2", new Derived2()));
    m["base"]->print();
    m["d1"]->print();
    m["d2"]->print();

    return 0;
}

Answer 2

First things first:

template<class myClas>
map<string, myClass> m;

This is not valid C++ and could only mean something like a template alias, but I believe, that is not what you are looking for.

Storing polymorphic objects in C++ is complicated by slicing (constructing a value of the base type from a value of a derived type). Dynamic polymorphism can only be handled through references or pointers. You could potentially use std::ref or boost::ref for situations in which the map will only be passed down the callstack, but this requires some care. Often, storing pointers to the base is the way to go: std::map<std::string, base*>. Managing deallocation yourself is rather tedious and either std::map<std::string, std::unique_ptr> or std::map<std::string, std::shared_ptr> are preferred, depending if you need shared semantics or not.

Basic example. Someone should replace this with something more meaningful.

#include <memory>
#include <string>
#include <map>
#include <iostream>

class animal
{
public:
  virtual ~animal() {};
  virtual void make_sound() const = 0;
};

class dog : public animal
{
public:
  void make_sound() const { std::cout << "bark" << std::endl; }
};
class bird : public animal
{
public:
  void make_sound() const { std::cout << "chirp" << std::endl; }
};

int main()
{
  std::map<std::string, std::unique_ptr<animal>> m;
  m.insert(std::make_pair("stupid_dog_name", new dog));
  m.insert(std::make_pair("stupid_bird_name", new bird));
  m["stupid_dog_name"]->make_sound();
  return 0;
}

Answer 3

You may have template on classes and functions, but not on instances.

You should stick to the map to BaseClass*'es.

Answer 4

Below is the expansion of solution suggested by anton.

#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <map>
#include <utility>

using namespace std;

class BaseClass
{
    string s;

public: 
    BaseClass() { s = "BaseClass";} 
virtual ~ BaseClass(){}
virtual void print()=0;
};


class Derived1 : public BaseClass
{
    int i;
public:
    Derived1() { i = 10; }
    void print() 
    {
        cout << i << std::endl;
    }

};

class Derived2 : public Derived1
{
    float f;
public:
    Derived2() { f = 4.3;}
    void print() 
    {
        cout << f << std::endl;
    }
};

class factory
{
map<string, BaseClass*>m;
BaseClass* obj;
public:
factory()
{
obj=NULL;
}
BaseClass* FindType(string s);
void AddType(string s,BaseClass *obj);
void deleter();
~factory(){cout<<"deleting objects from map"<<endl;
deleter();
}
};
void factory :: AddType(string s,BaseClass* obj)
{ 
 m.insert(make_pair(s,obj ));
}
void factory ::deleter ()
 {

   for (auto  pObj = m.begin( );
        pObj != m.end( ); ++pObj) {

      delete pObj->second;
   }

   m.clear( );  

 }
BaseClass* factory::FindType(string s)
{
if(m.find(s)!=m.end())
{

return  m[s];
}

return NULL;
}

int main()
{   
   BaseClass* obj;
   factory fact_obj; 
   fact_obj.AddType("d1",new Derived1());
   fact_obj.AddType("d2",new Derived2());
   obj=fact_obj.FindType("d1");
   if(obj!=NULL)
      {
    obj->print();
      }
    obj=fact_obj.FindType("d2");
    if(obj!=NULL)
     {
     obj->print(); 
     }

    return 0;
}