I have an assignment that is the following:
For a given integer array, find the sum of its elements and print out the final result, but to get the sum, you need to e
The array has 10
elements so 10
is not a valid array index.
vector<int> v(array[0], array[10]);
^^
What you want is:
vector<int> v(array, array + sizeof(array) / sizeof(int) );
Well, there's a couple problems beyond what people have said so far. One is your fault and the other is, in my opinion, a problem with the assignment.
You're printing out the elements, not the sum. The assignment asks for the sum so...you're doing it wrong. You need some call X that sums up all the values and sticks that into a variable for later printing.
The other problem is that std::for_each is not the appropriate algorithm for this task. In fact, it's so much not the appropriate algorithm that it's not even guaranteed to work without a lot of funky hacks to make all copies of the functor you pass in to for_each share the same counter. Maybe this is what your teacher wants you to figure out how to do, but I have a feeling (having experienced the common ability of programming instructors) that he/she doesn't actually know that they're teaching you wrong. The main gist of the problem is that implementations of std::for_each are free to make any number of copies of the function object passed in to recursive or utility calls to produce the standard behavior of for_each.
The appropriate algorithm to use is std::accumulate. In any production code I'd refuse to write, or accept from another team member, use of std::for_each to produce sums. However, I'd probably respond to this situation with a fugly hack and comment mentioning that for_each is the wrong algorithm. Something like so:
struct fugly_functor
{
int * summation_variable; // using a local copy will result in correct answer, or a completely wrong answer depending on implementation of for_each
fugly_functor(int * c) : counter(c) {}
void operator(int x) { *summation_variable += x; }
};
...
int my_sum;
std::for_each(array, array+ELEM_COUNT, fugly_functor(&my_sum));
std::cout << my_sum << std::endl;
Then I'd suggest my teacher familiarize himself with the complete set of standard C++ algorithms.
The correct way would look something like so:
int my_sum = std::accumulate(array, array+ELEM_COUNT, 0);
You need to take the address of array[0] and array[sizeof(array) / sizeof(*array)]. Vector constructor takes iterator types (i.e. pointers in this context), it can't magically determine the value of array[1] from the value of array[0].
In this line:
vector<int> v(array[0], array[10]);
You've indexed out of bounds of your array. This causes undefined behavior.
Also, the constructor for vector you used doesn't do what you think. You've used:
vector(initial value, count);