In below code
var A = function() {};
var a = new A();
var b = new A();
A.prototype = {};
var c = new A();
console.log(a.constructor === b.constructor);
con
When you construct an object, the constructor's prototype
property is copied to the new object's __proto__
, so while a
and b
retain the old prototype (which also contains the .constructor
property), c
uses the new blank prototype (which doesn't have constructor
as own property). Here's a diagram:
After a = new A; b = new A
:
After A.prototype = {}; c = new A()
As you can see, direct assignment to a prototype breaks the JS object system and may lead to surprising results (which your very question demonstrates). That's why it's generally frowned upon.
The problem is that when you use A.prototype={}
it is changed the behavior of A
object.
When you use A.prototype={}
, A object lost it’s constructor
.
Why it is this behavior ?
The constructor
property is assigned to prototype
function.
And in your case ,A.prototype
is replaced with a new Object {}
, which doesn't have constructor
property as own property (but its prototype has and is equal to Object
).
Lets see the following example:
function A() { } // (1)
A.prototype = {} // (2)
Before (2)
Object.prototype
{
constructor:Object
}
A.prototype
//was autocreated with A
{
constructor:A
}
After (2)
Object.prototype
{
constructor:Object
}
A.prototype
//reassigned with {}
{
//no constructor
}
When using function as an object constructor, its prototype.constructor
is automatically created with function's property. So initially after setting up the A function you will have a constructor in A's prototype:
A.prototype.constructor
So when you assign A.prototype ={}, you lost that original constructor in A.prototype
.
You may fix it with adding this after A.prototype ={}
line
A.prototype.constructor = A;
Both console should log true