In my app I\'m animating the opacity of elements on the page with something like:
.s {
transition-property: opacity;
transition-duration: 250ms;
}
visibility
is an animatable property, see the spec.
Which means your .hidden
class will work as you have described. Demo here: http://jsfiddle.net/ianlunn/xef3s/
Edit: the spec isn't perfectly clear:
visibility: if one of the values is ‘visible’, interpolated as a discrete step where values of the timing function between 0 and 1 map to ‘visible’ and other values of the timing function (which occur only at the start/end of the transition or as a result of ‘cubic-bezier()’ functions with Y values outside of [0, 1]) map to the closer endpoint; if neither value is ‘visible’ then not interpolable.
But this is what I believe it means:
visibility
doesn't smoothly animate between a range of visible
and hidden
in the way that opacity animates between 1 - 0. It simply switches between visible
and hidden
at the start and end states of the transition.
Providing the transition is either going to or from visibility
, then a transition will occur. If trying to transition between visibility: hidden
and visibility: collapse
for example, those values are "not interpolable" and the transition would not occur.
So in my example, opacity
causes the element to fade out and then at the end of the transition, visibility
snaps to hidden
.
As a good alternative to display/visibility toggle, opacity:0
with pointer-events:none
could be used.