C how to measure time correctly?

后端 未结 2 1377
伪装坚强ぢ
伪装坚强ぢ 2021-01-12 18:28

This is the \"algorithm\", but when I want to measure the execution time it gives me zero. Why?

#define ARRAY_SIZE 10000
...

clock_t start, end;

start = cl         


        
相关标签:
2条回答
  • This is an unreliable way to actually time number of seconds, since the clock() function is pretty low precision, and your loop isn't doing a lot of work. You can either make your loop do more so that it runs longer, or use a better timing method.

    The higher precision methods are platform specific. For Windows, see How to use QueryPerformanceCounter? and for linux see High resolution timer with C++ and Linux?

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-12 19:18

    Two things:

    1. 10000 is not a lot on a modern computer. Therefore that loop will run in probably less than a millisecond - less than the precision of clock(). Therefore it will return zero.

    2. If you aren't using the result of non_parallel its possible that the entire loop will be optimized out by the compiler.

    Most likely, you just need a more expensive loop. Try increasing ARRAY_SIZE to something much larger.


    Here's a test on my machine with a larger array size:

    #define ARRAY_SIZE 100000000
    
    int main(){
    
        clock_t start, end;
    
        double *non_parallel = (double*)malloc(ARRAY_SIZE * sizeof(double));
        double *vec          = (double*)malloc(ARRAY_SIZE * sizeof(double));
    
        start = clock();
    
        for(int i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE; i++) 
        {
            non_parallel[i] = vec[i] * vec[i];
        }
    
        end = clock();
        printf( "Number of seconds: %f\n", (end-start)/(double)CLOCKS_PER_SEC );
    
    
        free(non_parallel);
        free(vec);
        return 0;
    }
    

    Output:

    Number of seconds: 0.446000
    
    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题