Numpy Array: Efficiently find matching indices

前端 未结 3 740
一生所求
一生所求 2021-01-12 18:11

I have two lists, one of which is massive (millions of elements), the other several thousand. I want to do the following

bigArray=[0,1,0,2,3,2,,.....]

small         


        
相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-01-12 18:49

    So far I don't see any need for numpy; you can make use of defaultdict, provided that you memory is sufficient, it should be if number of observation is not too many millions.

    big_list = [0,1,0,2,3,2,5,6,7,5,6,4,5,3,4,3,5,6,5]
    small_list = [0,1,2,3,4]
    
    from collections import defaultdict
    
    dicto = defaultdict(list) #dictionary stores all the relevant coordinates
                              #so you don't have to search for them later
    
    for ind, ele in enumerate(big_list):
        dicto[ele].append(ind)
    

    Result:

    >>> for ele in small_list:
    ...     print dicto[ele]
    ... 
    [0, 2]
    [1]
    [3, 5]
    [4, 13, 15]
    [11, 14]
    

    This should give you some speed.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-12 18:59

    Numpy provides the function numpy.searchsorted: http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-1.10.0/reference/generated/numpy.searchsorted.html

    Example:

    >>> import numpy as np
    >>> sorted = np.argsort(big_list)
    >>> r = np.searchsorted(big_list, small_list, side='right',sorter=sorted)
    >>> l  = np.searchsorted(big_list, small_list, side='left',sorter=sorted)
    >>> for b, e in zip(l, r):
    ...     inds = sorted[b:e]
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-12 19:08

    In your case you may benefit from presorting your big array. Here is the example demonstrating how you can reduce the time from ~ 45 seconds to 2 seconds (on my laptop)(for one particular set of lengths of the arrays 5e6 vs 1e3). Obviously the solution won't be optimal if the array sizes will be wastly different. E.g. with the default solution the complexity is O(bigN*smallN), but for my suggested solution it is O((bigN+smallN)*log(bigN))

    import numpy as np, numpy.random as nprand, time, bisect
    
    bigN = 5e6
    smallN = 1000
    maxn = 1e7
    nprand.seed(1)  
    bigArr = nprand.randint(0, maxn, size=bigN)
    smallArr = nprand.randint(0, maxn, size=smallN)
    
    # brute force 
    t1 = time.time()
    for i in range(len(smallArr)):
        inds = np.where(bigArr == smallArr[i])[0]
    t2 = time.time()
    print "Brute", t2-t1
    
    # not brute force (like nested loop with index scan)
    t1 = time.time()
    sortedind = np.argsort(bigArr)
    sortedbigArr = bigArr[sortedind]
    for i in range(len(smallArr)):
        i1 = bisect.bisect_left(sortedbigArr, smallArr[i])
        i2 = bisect.bisect_right(sortedbigArr, smallArr[i])
        inds = sortedind[i1:i2]
    t2=time.time()
    print "Non-brute", t2-t1
    

    Output:

    Brute 42.5278530121

    Non-brute 1.57193303108

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题