whos could be much efficient if I use nestted subquery
, JOINs
Or maybe temp tables
..
another question : in subqueries if i use IN Cl
The two queries are equivalent, and should produce identical plans. It's a misconception that CTEs are compiled only once, providing a performance benefit. Non-recursive CTEs are just syntactic sugar for derived tables/inline views (IMO mistakenly referred to as subqueries).
Secondly, JOINs vs IN/EXISTS can produce different results. JOINs risk duplicated data, if there's two or more supporting records. EXISTS is best used if there are duplicate criteria, because it returns true on the first encounter of the criteria - making it potentially faster than IN or JOIN. There's no data duplication risk when using EXISTS or IN.
Use the execution plan in SQL Server Management Studio and see for yourself what runs faster against your database.
First, your syntax is probably incorrect.Thus, the two formats would look like:
Select ...
From X
Where Exists( Select 1 From Y Where Idx = Y.SomeColumn )
Or Exists( Select 1 From Y Idy = Y.SomeColumn )
And
With XX As
(
Select ...
From Y
)
Select ...
From X
Where Exists ( Select 1 From XX Where Idx = XX.SomeColumn )
Or Exists ( Select 1 From XX Where Idy = XX.SomeColumn )
Note the Exists statements. They are not Where Col Exists(...
but instead are just Where Exists( ...
.
Second, the efficiency and speed will depend on the data, statistics, indexes and, at the end of the day, what the optimizer is able to make more efficient. Thus, you really need to look at the execution plan to know which is faster. Now, another form might be:
Select ...
From X
Where Exists (
Select 1
From Y
Where Idx = Y.SomeColumn
Union All
Select 1
From Y
Where Idy = Y.SomeColumn
)
Joins are far quicker than the other suggestions you made.
Joins will perform the ON condition for every record whereas doing selects with a WHERE will pull in ALL records first, then perform the filter, thus being much slower.
Joins all the way !!