GetLocalTime() API time resolution

Question

I need to find out time taken by a function in my application. Application is a MS VIsual Studio 2005 solution, all C code.

I used thw windows API GetLocalTime(SYST

Answer 1

One caution on multiprocessor systems:

from http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms644904(VS.85).aspx

On a multiprocessor computer, it should not matter which processor is called. However, you can get different results on different processors due to bugs in the basic input/output system (BIOS) or the hardware abstraction layer (HAL). To specify processor affinity for a thread, use the SetThreadAffinityMask function.

Al Weiner

Answer 2

You can try to use clock() which will provide the number of "ticks" between two points. A "tick" is the smallest unit of time a processor can measure.

As a side note, you can't use clock() to determine the actual time - only the number of ticks between two points in your program.

Answer 3

On Windows you can use the 'high performance counter API'. Check out: QueryPerformanceCounter and QueryPerformanceCounterFrequency for the details.

Answer 4

There are some other possibilities.

QueryPerformanceCounter and QueryPerformanceFrequency

QueryPerformanceCounter will return a "performance counter" which is actually a CPU-managed 64-bit counter that increments from 0 starting with the computer power-on. The frequency of this counter is returned by the QueryPerformanceFrequency. To get the time reference in seconds, divide performance counter by performance frequency. In Delphi:

function QueryPerfCounterAsUS: int64;     
begin
  if QueryPerformanceCounter(Result) and
     QueryPerformanceFrequency(perfFreq)
  then
    Result := Round(Result / perfFreq * 1000000);
  else
    Result := 0;
end;

On multiprocessor platforms, QueryPerformanceCounter should return consistent results regardless of the CPU the thread is currently running on. There are occasional problems, though, usually caused by bugs in hardware chips or BIOSes. Usually, patches are provided by motherboard manufacturers. Two examples from the MSDN:

• Programs that use the QueryPerformanceCounter function may perform poorly in Windows Server 2003 and in Windows XP
• Performance counter value may unexpectedly leap forward

Another problem with QueryPerformanceCounter is that it is quite slow.

RDTSC instruction

If you can limit your code to one CPU (SetThreadAffinity), you can use RDTSC assembler instruction to query performance counter directly from the processor.

function CPUGetTick: int64;
asm
  dw 310Fh // rdtsc
end;

RDTSC result is incremented with same frequency as QueryPerformanceCounter. Divide it by QueryPerformanceFrequency to get time in seconds.

QueryPerformanceCounter is much slower thatn RDTSC because it must take into account multiple CPUs and CPUs with variable frequency. From Raymon Chen's blog:

(QueryPerformanceCounter) counts elapsed time. It has to, since its value is governed by the QueryPerformanceFrequency function, which returns a number specifying the number of units per second, and the frequency is spec'd as not changing while the system is running.

For CPUs that can run at variable speed, this means that the HAL cannot use an instruction like RDTSC, since that does not correlate with elapsed time.

timeGetTime

TimeGetTime belongs to the Win32 multimedia Win32 functions. It returns time in milliseconds with 1 ms resolution, at least on a modern hardware. It doesn't hurt if you run timeBeginPeriod(1) before you start measuring time and timeEndPeriod(1) when you're done.

GetLocalTime and GetSystemTime

Before Vista, both GetLocalTime and GetSystemTime return current time with millisecond precision, but they are not accurate to a millisecond. Their accuracy is typically in the range of 10 to 55 milliseconds. (Precision is not the same as accuracy) On Vista, GetLocalTime and GetSystemTime both work with 1 ms resolution.