Pickle: Not safe or fast?

后端 未结 2 946
北海茫月
北海茫月 2021-01-12 00:40

I\'m working through some scipy lectures (http://scipy-lectures.github.io/intro/language/standard_library.html#pickle-easy-persistence) and I came across this statement abou

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2021-01-12 01:28

    Using pickle in production code is vulnerable by design. Arbitrary code can be executed while unpickling. You can safely unpickle only data from trusted sources. Never unpickle data received from an untrusted or unauthenticated source.

    See here for real applications samples.

    As for faster alternative, there is marshal, python internal serealization library. But unlike pickle (or cPickle, which is just a C implementation), it is less stable (see docs) and its output being architecture and os independend, depends on python version. That is object marshal'ed on Windows platform with python 2.7.5 is guaranteed to be un-marshalable on OS X or Ubuntu with python 2.7.5 installed, but not guaranteed to be un-marshalable with python 2.6 on Windows.

    Another faster, safer by design, but less functional serialization alternative is JSON.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-12 01:29

    The original module Pickle is almost never used.

    If you need to do it fast, use cPickle.

    If you need a safe one, try sPickle.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题