How to check if a variable is Array or Object?

前端 未结 3 483
后悔当初
后悔当初 2021-01-11 14:24

For deserialising a json object, I had to define a parent class that would contain an object or an array of objects for the child class. It has to be an object if an object

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-01-11 15:02

    I've been using the Json.NET Nuget package, and it's been really easy to work with:

      string jsonStr = "{'y':{'x':[{'data':28}, {'data':56}, {'data':89}]}}";
      dynamic jobject = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(jsonStr);
    
      bool isArray  = jobject.y.x.Type == JTokenType.Array;
      bool isObject = jobject.y.x.Type == JTokenType.Object;
    

    Hope this helps!

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-11 15:06

    the property x of Type X in class Y cannot be an array of X if you explicity state it is of type X. Declaring it as an object would be one way to get round this.

    If you want to check it is an array I would use a backing field (say _x) and then where you use the property do a check (typeof(_x) == X[])

    That could get messy though, my best advice would be set the type of property x to X[] and in the set determine whether the value was an array (if so just set _x = value) or if not add value to an empty array of X

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-11 15:10

    First off, an array is an object. That's a good thing, since it allows these functions to work (both assume using System;):

    bool IsArray(object o) { return o is Array; }
    bool IsArray(object o) { return o.GetType().IsArray; }
    

    Second, if you want a property whose type can be either X or X[], the property's type needs to be object:

    class Y             
    {
       private object _x;
       public object x {
           get { return _x; }
           set
           {
               if (value.GetType != typeof(X) && value.GetType != typeof(X[]))
                   throw new ArgumentException("value");
               _x = value;
           }
       }
    }
    

    This somewhat ignores the advantage of static typing, as you're using object and checking types at run time. It would really be much simpler to define the property as an array, even for those cases where there's only one value. In such cases, it would be an array whose length is 1.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题