IEEE double such that sqrt(x*x) ≠ x

后端 未结 1 1096
终归单人心
终归单人心 2021-01-07 22:28

Does there exist an IEEE double x>0 such that sqrt(x*x) ≠ x, under the condition that the computation x*x does not overflow or unde

相关标签:
1条回答
  • 2021-01-07 22:29

    Sylvie Boldo has formally proved that a floating-point number satisfying the conditions in your question does not exist.

    Quoting the abstract of the article:

    Floating-point experts know that mathematical formulas may fail or give imprecise results when implemented in floating-point arithmetic. This article describes an example where, surprisingly, it is absolutely not the case. Indeed, using radix 2 and an unbounded exponent range, the computation of the square root of the square of a floating-point number a is exactly |a|. A consequence is the fact that the floating-point computation of a/ sqrt (a2 + b2) is always in the interval [−1, 1]. This removes the need for a test when calling an arccos or an arcsin on this value. For more guarantees, this property was formally checked using the Coq proof assistant and the Flocq library. The conclusion will give hints on what happens without assumptions and in other radices, where the behavior is very different.

    “using radix 2” was likely implicit in your question (although the IEEE has also standardized decimal floating-point number formats and operations), and “an unbounded exponent range” is equivalent to your “no overflow or underflow” restriction.

    A reason making the property possible at all is that x*x “expands” (the interval [1,2] is mapped to [1,4], for instance) in a way such that, when there is no overflow or underflow, the rounding that can happen for * is benign and x is still the closest representable floating-point number to the real square root of the floating-point product x*x. This hand-wavy argument does not constitute a proof, so it's a good thing that the article linked above contains one.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题