It\'s about strcat
function.
while (*p)
p++;
and
while (*++p)
;
both works, but
Let's assume that p
is a string.
while (*p) p++; /* (1) */
while (*++p) ; /* (2) */
while (*p++) ; /* (3) */
p
is an empty string.*p
is a '\0'
character, p
is incremented.Both
while (*p) p++;
and
while (*++p) ;
will advance p
to point to the 0 terminator in a string, whereas
while (*p++) ;
will advance p
to point one character past the 0 terminator.
To see why, let's assume the following characters in memory:
Address 0x00 0x01 0x02 0x03
------- ---- ---- ---- ----
0x8000 'a' 'b' 'c' 0
0x8004 ...
Assume that p
starts at address 0x8000. Here's how the first loop plays out:
1. *p = 'a'
2. p = 0x8001
3. *p = 'b'
4. p = 0x8002
5. *p = 'c'
6. p = 0x8003
7. *p = 0
8. end loop
Here's how the second loop plays out:
1. p = 0x8001
2. *p = 'b'
3. p = 0x8002
4. *p = 'c'
5. p = 0x8003
6. *p = 0
7. end loop
And here's the last one:
1. *p = 'a'
2. p = 0x8001
3. *p = 'b'
4. p = 0x8002
5. *p = 'c'
6. p = 0x8003
7. *p = 0;
8. p = 0x8004
9. end loop
In the last version, evaluating *p++
advances the pointer even if the value of *p
is 0.
*++p means increment this variable, then use it
*p++ means use the variable, then increment it
// move p forward as long as it points to a non-0 character,
// leave it pointing to a 0 character.
while (*p) p++;
// move p forward until it points to a 0 character, skipping the first
// character before you start
while (*++p);
// move p forward until it points one past a 0 character
while (*p++);
So given that (1) "works": (2) also works if p
initially points to a non-empty string. (3) doesn't work at all because p
ends up pointing to a different place.
*++p
increments p
and then evaluates to whatever p
now points to. *p++
evaluates to whatever p
initially points to, but also increments p
. Hence (2) and (3) are different.
(1) and (3) are different because (3) executes the p++
, then it decides whether to stop. (1) first looks at *p
to decide whether to stop, and if not stopping it executes the p++
.