How do I remove “duplicate” rows from a view?

后端 未结 5 1752
孤城傲影
孤城傲影 2021-01-06 10:58

I have a view which was working fine when I was joining my main table:

LEFT OUTER JOIN OFFICE ON CLIENT.CASE_OFFICE = OFFICE.TABLE_CODE.

相关标签:
5条回答
  • 2021-01-06 11:02

    So you added a left outer join that is matching two rows? OFFICE_MIS.TABLE_CODE is not unique in that table I presume? you need to restrict that join to only grab one row. It depends on which row you are looking for, but you can do something like this...

    LEFT OUTER JOIN OFFICE_MIS ON 
      OFFICE_MIS.ID = /* whatever the primary key is? */
        (select top 1 om2.ID
        from OFFICE_MIS om2
        where CLIENT.REFERRAL_OFFICE = om2.TABLE_CODE
        order by om2.ID /* change the order to fit your needs */)
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-06 11:09

    You could try using Distinct Top 1 but as Hunter pointed out, if there is if even one column is different then it should either be included or if you don't care about or need the column you should probably remove it. Any other suggestions would probably require more specific info.

    EDIT: When using Distinct Top 1 you need to have an appropriate group by statement. You would really be using the Top 1 part. The Distinct is in there because if there is a tie for Top 1 you'll get an error without having some way to avoid a tie. The two most common ways I've seen are adding Distinct to Top 1 or you could add a column to the query that is unique so that sql would have a way to choose which record to pick in what would otherwise be a tie.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-06 11:14

    Instead of using DISTINCT, you could use a GROUP BY.

    • Group by all the fields that you want to be returned as unique values.
    • Use MIN/MAX/AVG or any other function to give you one result for fields that could return multiple values.

    Example:

    SELECT Office.Field1, Client.Field1, MIN(Office.Field1), MIN(Client.Field2)  
    FROM YourQuery  
    GROUP BY Office.Field1, Client.Field1
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-06 11:22

    DISTINCT won't help you if the rows have any columns that are different. Obviously, one of the tables you are joining to has multiple rows for a single row in another table. To get one row back, you have to eliminate the other multiple rows in the table you are joining to.

    The easiest way to do this is to enhance your where clause or JOIN restriction to only join to the single record you would like. Usually this requires determining a rule which will always select the 'correct' entry from the other table.

    Let us assume you have a simple problem such as this:

    Person:  Jane
    Pets: Cat, Dog
    

    If you create a simple join here, you would receive two records for Jane:

    Jane|Cat
    Jane|Dog
    

    This is completely correct if the point of your view is to list all of the combinations of people and pets. However, if your view was instead supposed to list people with pets, or list people and display one of their pets, you hit the problem you have now. For this, you need a rule.

    SELECT Person.Name, Pets.Name
    FROM Person
      LEFT JOIN Pets pets1 ON pets1.PersonID = Person.ID
    WHERE 0 = (SELECT COUNT(pets2.ID) 
                 FROM Pets pets2
                 WHERE pets2.PersonID = pets1.PersonID
                    AND pets2.ID < pets1.ID);
    

    What this does is apply a rule to restrict the Pets record in the join to to the Pet with the lowest ID (first in the Pets table). The WHERE clause essentially says "where there are no pets belonging to the same person with a lower ID value).

    This would yield a one record result:

    Jane|Cat
    

    The rule you'll need to apply to your view will depend on the data in the columns you have, and which of the 'multiple' records should be displayed in the column. However, that will wind up hiding some data, which may not be what you want. For example, the above rule hides the fact that Jane has a Dog. It makes it appear as if Jane only has a Cat, when this is not correct.

    You may need to rethink the contents of your view, and what you are trying to accomplish with your view, if you are starting to filter out valid data.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-06 11:27

    If the secondd row has one different value than it is not really duplicate and should be included.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题