In which scenarios, we need multiple Dispatcher-Servlets
?
Can anyone please tell me the use cases of multiple Dispat
As DispatcherServlet is very flexible. Not only Spring MVC uses it, but also Spring WS and etc.
In general, we declare multiple dispatcher servlets when we need multiple sets of MVC configuration. For example, we may have a REST API alongside a traditional MVC application or an unsecured and a secure section of a website:
Source of this answer, read in detail...
Strictly seperating user and admin functionality. Or one for plain Spring MVC and another for Spring Web Flow. If there are major configuration differences for some controllers. (We actually used the Spring MVC and Spring Web Flow seperation so that we could add this without affecting the already exising configs). Nowadays with servlet 3.0 you could develop seperate parts of your application seperatly and have all of them contribute there own DispatcherServlet and mappings (although you could also achieve this with some configuration conventions).
From Documentation
A web application can define any number of DispatcherServlets. Each servlet will operate in its own namespace, loading its own application context with mappings, handlers, etc. Only the root application context as loaded by ContextLoaderListener, if any, will be shared.
Simple answer is to have DispatcherServlet's functionality in several forms
DispatcherServlet
Declaring Multiple dispatcher servlets
Consider we have two dispatcher servlets(DS) where DS1, DS2 are configured with different url patterns(**.simple, **.beanName
) and they uses different dispatcher servlet configuration provided as given below.
DispatcherServlet - simpleUrlHandlerDispatcherServlet
contextConfigLocation - /WEB-INF/simpleUrlHandlerMapping.xml
<url-pattern>*.simple</url-pattern>
DispatcherServlet - beanNameUrlHandlerDispatcherServlet
contextConfigLocation - /WEB-INF/beanNameUrlHandlerMapping.xml
<url-pattern>*.beanName</url-pattern>
Advantage 1: We can have different HandlerMapping for different set of URL
DS1 bean name url handler mapping configuration
<bean name="/hello.beanName" class="com.pvn.mvc.HelloController" />
<bean name="/hi.beanName" class="com.pvn.mvc.HiController" />
DS2 simple url handler mapping configuration
<bean class="org.springframework.web.servlet.handler.SimpleUrlHandlerMapping">
<property name="mappings">
<props>
<prop key="/hello.simple">simpleHello</prop>
<prop key="/hi.simple">simpleHi</prop>
</props>
</property>
</bean>
Advantage 2: We can have different view resolver for different set of URL's.
InternalResourceViewResolver for DS1
where it deals with only prefix + returned String + suffix
.
TilesViewResolver for DS2
its implementation provided by apache tiles which is a layout/skeleton based plugin high level functionality as given below.
Or if we use TilesViewResolver with different layout for different set of URL's
anonymous user - different layout
logged in user - different layout
Advantage 3: We can have different theme resolver for different set of URL's.
These resolver continuously monitors cookie/session to resolve theme and serves stylesheet/theme qualified (as given in below image). Below given just an example for outcome of CookieThemeResolver.
Note: This is not about theme configuration but about theme resolver configuration.
Advantage 4: We can have different locale resolver for different set of URL's.
These resolver continuously monitors cookie/session/accept-header to resolve locale and loads application message qualified(as given in below image). Below given just an example for outcome of CookieLocaleResolver.
Note: This is not about locale configuration but about locale resolver configuration.