The @support rule allows one to do a feature query on CSS properties. I am wondering whether it is possible to do a feature check on specifically @media rules?
For e
This does not seem to work. Should it work?
No; @supports
only supports property declarations, not at-rules or indeed any other grammatical construct in CSS. You're not looking to check for support for the @media
rule anyway; you're trying to check for support for specific media features. But @supports
doesn't support that either, even though media features share the same declaration syntax with property declarations.
To that end, you don't need the @supports
rule at all. To check if a browser supports a certain media feature, simply write a @media
rule with a media query list containing both the media feature and its negation:
@media not all and (pointer), (pointer) {
p { color: green; }
}
<p>If this text is green, your browser supports the <code>pointer</code> media feature.
(Note that Media Queries 4 removes the restriction of not
requiring a media type from MQ3, so the negation really ought to be not (pointer)
, but no browser supports this yet and a media type is still required.)
Browsers that don't recognize the pointer
media feature will interpret the @media
rule as @media not all, not all
(in spite of the not
in the not all and (pointer)
media query). See section 3.2 of the spec, which says
An unknown <mf-name> or <mf-value>, or disallowed <mf-value>, results in the value “unknown”. A <media-query> whose value is “unknown” must be replaced with not all.
If you need to apply CSS for when a browser does not support a media feature, these error handling rules mean you'll need to take advantage of the cascade (and if you don't know the original values in advance, you may be stuck):
p { color: red; }
@media not all and (pointer), (pointer) {
p { color: currentcolor; }
}
<p>If this text is red, your browser does not support the <code>pointer</code> media feature.