STI and polymorphs

前端 未结 5 1352
孤独总比滥情好
孤独总比滥情好 2021-01-04 13:53

I have problem with my code

class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
end

class NewsArticle < Post
  has_many :comments, :as => :commentable, :dependent =>         


        
相关标签:
5条回答
  • 2021-01-04 14:17

    The commentable_type field needs to store the name of the table that contains the data, once that row is loaded from the right table, the inherited type will be loaded from the type column on the Posts table.

    So:

    Here the comment points to the table that it comments on. The posts table, id 1

    >> Comment.first
    => #<Comment id: 1, commentable_id: 1, commentable_type: "Post", body: "test", created_at: "2010-04-09 00:56:36", updated_at: "2010-04-09 00:56:36">
    

    Then to load the NewsArticle, id 1 is loaded from posts, and the type there indicates a NewsArticle.

    >> Comment.first.commentable
    => #<NewsArticle id: 1, type: "NewsArticle", name: "one", body: "body", created_at: "2010-04-09 00:55:35", updated_at: "2010-04-09 00:55:35">
    >> Comment.first.commentable.class.table_name
    => "posts"
    

    If commentable_type held "NewsArticle" it would have to look at the class to determine the table. This way it can just look to the table and worry about the type once it gets there.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-04 14:20

    Good question. I had exactly the same problem using Rails 3.1. Looks the problem is not solved yet. Apparently, using polymorphic associations in combination with Single Table Inheritance (STI) in Rails is a bit complicated.

    The current Rails documentation for Rails 3.2 gives this advice for combining polymorphic associations and STI:

    Using polymorphic associations in combination with single table inheritance (STI) is a little tricky. In order for the associations to work as expected, ensure that you store the base model for the STI models in the type column of the polymorphic association.

    In your case the base model would be "Post", i.e. "commentable_type" should be "Post" for all comments.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-04 14:35

    Technically, there's actually nothing wrong with this. When Rails is dealing with a polymorphic association, and the object being associated is using STI, it simply uses the base class as the type (in your case "commentable_type").

    If you have Post and NewsArticle in separate tables, obviously the commentable_type will show up as Post and NewsArticle respectively.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-04 14:36

    Take a look at the Polymorphic Associations section of ActiveRecord::Associations API. There is a little bit about using polymorphic associations in combination with single table inheritance. Following the second code example in that section I think this might be close to what you want

    class Comment < ActiveRecord::Base
      belongs_to :commentable, :polymorphic => true, :counter_cache => true
    
      def commentable_type=(sType)
       super(sType.to_s.classify.constantize.base_class.to_s)
      end
    end
    
    class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
      has_many :comments, :as => :commentable, :dependent => :destroy, :order => 'created_at'
    end
    
    class NewsArticle < Post
    end
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-04 14:37

    def commentable_type=(sType) super(sType.to_s.classify.constantize.base_class.to_s) end

    This method is returning class as Post, what to do if you want to store the inherited class Post as commentable_type?

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题