I have a \"requirement\" to give a timestamp to the nearest second... but NOT more accurate than that. Rounding or truncating the time is fine.
I have come up with t
If you really want to round the time to the nearest second, you can use:
DateTime.MinValue
.AddSeconds(Math.Round((DateTime.Now - DateTime.MinValue).TotalSeconds));
However unless that extra half a second really makes a difference, you can just remove the millisecond portion:
DateTime.Now.AddTicks( -1 * (DateTime.Now.Ticks % TimeSpan.TicksPerSecond));
You can use this constructor:
public DateTime(
int year,
int month,
int day,
int hour,
int minute,
int second
)
so it would be:
DateTime dt = DateTime.Now;
DateTime secondsDt = new DateTime(dt.Year, dt.Month, dt.Day, dt.Hour, dt.Minute, dt.Second);
Try this
TimeSpan span= dateTime.Subtract(new DateTime(1970,1,1,0,0,0, DateTimeKind.Utc));
return span.TotalSeconds;
Here is a rounding method that rounds up or down to the nearest second instead of just trimming:
public static DateTime Round(this DateTime date, long ticks = TimeSpan.TicksPerSecond) {
if (ticks>1)
{
var frac = date.Ticks % ticks;
if (frac != 0)
{
// Rounding is needed..
if (frac*2 >= ticks)
{
// round up
return new DateTime(date.Ticks + ticks - frac);
}
else
{
// round down
return new DateTime(date.Ticks - frac);
}
}
}
return date;
}
It can be used like this:
DateTime now = DateTime.Now;
DateTime nowTrimmedToSeconds = now.Round(TimeSpan.TicksPerSecond);
DateTime nowTrimmedToMinutes = now.Round(TimeSpan.TicksPerMinute);
You could implement this as an extension method that allows you to trim a given DateTime to a specified accuracy using the underlying Ticks:
public static DateTime Trim(this DateTime date, long ticks) {
return new DateTime(date.Ticks - (date.Ticks % ticks), date.Kind);
}
Then it is easy to trim your date to all kinds of accuracies like so:
DateTime now = DateTime.Now;
DateTime nowTrimmedToSeconds = now.Trim(TimeSpan.TicksPerSecond);
DateTime nowTrimmedToMinutes = now.Trim(TimeSpan.TicksPerMinute);
After working with the selected solution I am satisfied that it works well. However the implementations of the extension methods posted here do not offer any validation to ensure the ticks value you pass in is a valid ticks value. They also do not preserve the DateTimeKind of the DateTime object being truncated. (This has subtle but relevant side effects when storing to a database like MongoDB.)
If the true goal is to truncate a DateTime to a specified value (i.e. Hours/Minutes/Seconds/MS) I recommend implementing this extension method in your code instead. It ensures that you can only truncate to a valid precision and it preserves the important DateTimeKind metadata of your original instance:
public static DateTime Truncate(this DateTime dateTime, long ticks)
{
bool isValid = ticks == TimeSpan.TicksPerDay
|| ticks == TimeSpan.TicksPerHour
|| ticks == TimeSpan.TicksPerMinute
|| ticks == TimeSpan.TicksPerSecond
|| ticks == TimeSpan.TicksPerMillisecond;
// https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21704604/have-datetime-now-return-to-the-nearest-second
return isValid
? DateTime.SpecifyKind(
new DateTime(
dateTime.Ticks - (dateTime.Ticks % ticks)
),
dateTime.Kind
)
: throw new ArgumentException("Invalid ticks value given. Only TimeSpan tick values are allowed.");
}
Then you can use the method like this:
DateTime dateTime = DateTime.UtcNow.Truncate(TimeSpan.TicksPerMillisecond);
dateTime.Kind => DateTimeKind.Utc