I am sent the assistance by many advisors in stackoverflow, In part of my problem is solved but a few problems are remained.
I consult the answer and I has try to s
You are misusing the namespace pattern. The goal in this case is to namespace all your custom Backbone classes constructor into the app
object.
In order to keep everything clearly separated, put all your collections constructor into the app.Collection
object, models constructor within app.Model
, etc.
If you inspect the app
namespace after all the classes are created, it should look like the following:
var app = {
Collection: {
VideoList: /* video list constructor */
},
Model: {
Video: /* video model constructor */
},
View: {
/* same thing goes for views */
}
};
The app
namespace shouldn't1 contain instances, mainly constructors.
Do not overwrite the constructors references:
app.Model = new models.Video();
Create an instance when you need one only, and keep it in the scope it's needed.
this.model = new app.Model.Video();
this.collection = app.Collection.VideoList();
To really understand the previous point, you need to understand the differences between a constructor and an instance. The concept is applicable to other OOP languages, but I'll keep the description within the JavaScript language specifics.
A constructor is just a function. From the MDN doc on Object.prototype.constructor:
All objects will have a
constructor
property.[...]
The following example creates a prototype,
Tree
, and an object of that type,theTree
.function Tree(name) { this.name = name; } var theTree = new Tree('Redwood');
As seen in the previous example, to create an instance, use the new operator. What is the 'new' keyword in JavaScript?
The new operator creates an instance of a user-defined object type or of one of the built-in object types that has a constructor function.
new constructor[([arguments])]
Creating custom constructors lets you define custom types (classes). There are multiple ways to create more complex custom types in JavaScript but that's another discussion. For more details, see How to “properly” create a custom object in JavaScript?
Fortunately, Backbone provides an easy (opinionated) way to define new types, the extend function, which is available on all the Backbone's base types.
var ModelConstructor = Backbone.Model.extend({ /*...*/ });
var modelInstance = new ModelConstructor();
Note that myVariable = MyConstructor
will just pass a reference of the constructor to myVariable
, it won't create a new instance. You could still use the variable as the constructor though.
var myInstance = new myVariable();
If you look at your code, you'll notice that the app.Collection.VideoList
class uses the app.Model.Video
as the value for the model
property.
This means that app.Collection.VideoList
depends on the availability of the app.Model.Video
class. So the collection file should be inserted into the document after the model file.
Like in the other answer of mine you linked:
<script src="js/models/todo.js"></script><!-- no dependencies -->
<script src="js/collections/todos.js"></script><!-- depends on the model -->
<script src="js/views/todo-view.js"></script><!-- depends on the collection and the model -->
<script src="js/views/app-view.js"></script><!-- depends on the todo-view -->
<script src="js/routers/router.js"></script><!-- depends on the app view -->
<script src="js/app.js"></script><!-- depends on the router -->
1. The app
namespace object could contain an instance of an object if you want to share it between all your app, like a singleton, or a namespaced global, or a service.