Passing big complex arrays from Python to C++ - what's my best option?

前端 未结 3 1478
说谎
说谎 2021-01-03 05:02

2017/06/13 EDIT: I tried using boost as was suggested, but after spending more than 3 days trying to get it to compile and link, and failing, I decided that the stupid painf

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-01-03 05:35

    Note added in edit. As mentioned in the comments, python itself, being an interpreted language, has little potential for computational efficiency. So in order to make python scripts efficient, one must use modules which aren't all interpreted, but under the hood call compiled (and optimized) code written in, say, C/C++. This is exactly what numpy does for you, in particular for operations on whole arrays.

    Therefore, the first step towards efficient python scripts is the usage of numpy. Only the second step is to try to use your own compiled (and optimized) code. Therefore, I have assumed in my example below that you were using numpy to store the array of complex numbers. Everything else would be ill-advised.


    There are various ways in which you can access python's original data from within a C/C++ program. I personally have done this with boost.Python, but must warn you that the documentation and support are lousy at best: you're pretty much on your own (and stack overflow, of course).

    For example your C++ file may look like this

    // file.cc
    #include <boost/python.hpp>
    #include <boost/python/numpy.hpp>
    
    namespace p = boost::python;
    namespace n = p::numpy;
    
    n::ndarray func(const n::ndarray&input, double control_variable)
    {
      /* 
         your code here, see documentation for boost python
         you pass almost any python variable, doesn't have to be numpy stuff
      */
    }
    
    BOOST_PYTHON_MODULE(module_name)
    {
      Py_Initialize();
      n::initialize();   // only needed if you use numpy in the interface
      p::def("function", func, "doc-string");
    }
    

    to compile this, you may use a python script such as

    # setup.py
    
    from distutils.core import setup
    from distutils.extension import Extension
    
    module_name = Extension(
        'module_name',
        extra_compile_args=['-std=c++11','-stdlib=libc++','-I/some/path/','-march=native'],
        extra_link_args=['-stdlib=libc++'],
        sources=['file.cc'],
        libraries=['boost_python','boost_numpy'])
    
    setup(
        name='module_name',
        version='0.1',
        ext_modules=[module_name])
    

    and run it as python setup.py build, which will create an appropriate .so file in a sub-directory of build, which you can import from python.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-03 05:46

    An easy solution that I used many times is to build your "C++ side" as a dll (=shared object on Linux/OS X), provide a simple, C-like entrypoint (straight integers, pointers & co., no STL stuff) and pass the data through ctypes.

    This avoids boost/SIP/Swig/... build nightmares, can be kept zero-copy (with ctypes you can pass a straight pointer to your numpy data) and allow you to do whatever you want (especially on the build-side - no friggin' distutils, no boost, no nothing - build it with whatever can build a C-like dll) on the C++ side. It has also the nice side-effect of having your C++ algorithm callable from other languages (virtually any language has some way to interface with C libraries).


    Here's a quick artificial example. The C++ side is just:

    extern "C" {
    double sum_it(double *array, int size) {
        double ret = 0.;
        for(int i=0; i<size; ++i) {
            ret += array[i];
        }
        return ret;
    }
    }
    

    This has to be compiled to a dll (on Windows) or a .so (on Linux), making sure to export the sum_it function (automatic with gcc, requires a .def file with VC++).

    On the Python side, we can have a wrapper like

    import ctypes
    import os
    import sys
    import numpy as np
    
    path = os.path.dirname(__file__)
    cdll = ctypes.CDLL(os.path.join(path, "summer.dll" if sys.platform.startswith("win") else "summer.so"))
    _sum_it = cdll.sum_it
    _sum_it.restype = ctypes.c_double
    
    def sum_it(l):
        if isinstance(l, np.ndarray) and l.dtype == np.float64 and len(l.shape)==1:
            # it's already a numpy array with the right features - go zero-copy
            a = l.ctypes.data
        else:
            # it's a list or something else - try to create a copy
            arr_t = ctypes.c_double * len(l)
            a = arr_t(*l)
        return _sum_it(a, len(l))
    

    which makes sure that the data is marshaled correctly; then invoking the function is as trivial as

    import summer
    import numpy as np
    # from a list (with copy)
    print summer.sum_it([1, 2, 3, 4.5])
    # from a numpy array of the right type - zero-copy
    print summer.sum_it(np.array([3., 4., 5.]))
    

    See the ctypes documentation for more information on how to use it. See also the relevant documentation in numpy.


    For complex numbers, the situation is slightly more complicated, as there's no builtin for it in ctypes; if we want to use std::complex<double> on the C++ side (which is pretty much guaranteed to work fine with the numpy complex layout, namely a sequence of two doubles), we can write the C++ side as:

    extern "C" {
    std::complex<double> sum_it_cplx(std::complex<double> *array, int size) {
        std::complex<double> ret(0., 0.);
        for(int i=0; i<size; ++i) {
            ret += array[i];
        }
        return ret;
    }
    }
    

    Then, on the Python side, we have to replicate the c_complex layout to retrieve the return value (or to be able to build complex arrays without numpy):

    class c_complex(ctypes.Structure):
        # Complex number, compatible with std::complex layout
        _fields_ = [("real", ctypes.c_double), ("imag", ctypes.c_double)]
    
        def __init__(self, pycomplex):
            # Init from Python complex
            self.real = pycomplex.real
            self.imag = pycomplex.imag
    
        def to_complex(self):
            # Convert to Python complex
            return self.real + (1.j) * self.imag
    

    Inheriting from ctypes.Structure enables the ctypes marshalling magic, which is performed according to the _fields_ member; the constructor and extra methods are just for ease of use on the Python side.

    Then, we have to tell ctypes the return type

    _sum_it_cplx = cdll.sum_it_cplx
    _sum_it_cplx.restype = c_complex
    

    and finally write our wrapper, in a similar fashion to the previous one:

    def sum_it_cplx(l):
        if isinstance(l, np.ndarray) and l.dtype == np.complex and len(l.shape)==1:
            # the numpy array layout for complexes (sequence of two double) is already
            # compatible with std::complex (see https://stackoverflow.com/a/5020268/214671)
            a = l.ctypes.data
        else:
            # otherwise, try to build our c_complex
            arr_t = c_complex * len(l)
            a = arr_t(*(c_complex(r) for r in l))
        ret = _sum_it_cplx(a, len(l))
        return ret.to_complex()
    

    Testing it as above

    # from a complex list (with copy)
    print summer.sum_it_cplx([1. + 0.j, 0 + 1.j, 2 + 2.j])
    # from a numpy array of the right type - zero-copy
    print summer.sum_it_cplx(np.array([1. + 0.j, 0 + 1.j, 2 + 2.j]))
    

    yields the expected results:

    (3+3j)
    (3+3j)
    
    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-03 05:52

    I see the OP is over a year old now, but I recently addressed a similar problem using the native Python-C/C++ API and its Numpy-C/C++ extension, and since I personally don't enjoy using ctypes for various reasons (e.g., complex number workarounds, messy code), nor Boost, wanted to post my answer for future searchers.

    Documentation for the Python-C API and Numpy-C API are both quite extensive (albeit a little overwhelming at first). But after one or two successes, writing native C/C++ extensions becomes very easy.

    Here is an example C++ function that can be called from Python. It integrates a 3D numpy array of either real or complex (numpy.double or numpy.cdouble) type. The function will be imported through a DLL (.so) via the module cintegrate.so.

    #include "Python.h"
    #include "numpy/arrayobject.h"
    #include <math.h>
    
    static PyObject * integrate3(PyObject * module, PyObject * args)
    {
        PyObject * argy=NULL;        // Regular Python/C API
        PyArrayObject * yarr=NULL;   // Extended Numpy/C API
        double dx,dy,dz;
    
        // "O" format -> read argument as a PyObject type into argy (Python/C API)
        if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "Offffd", &argy,&dx,&dy,&dz)
        {
            PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, "Error parsing arguments.");
            return NULL;
        }
    
        // Determine if it's a complex number array (Numpy/C API)
        int DTYPE = PyArray_ObjectType(argy, NPY_FLOAT); 
        int iscomplex = PyTypeNum_ISCOMPLEX(DTYPE);      
    
        // parse python object into numpy array (Numpy/C API)
        yarr = (PyArrayObject *)PyArray_FROM_OTF(argy, DTYPE, NPY_ARRAY_IN_ARRAY);
        if (yarr==NULL) {
            Py_INCREF(Py_None);
            return Py_None;
        }
    
        //just assume this for 3 dimensional array...you can generalize to N dims
        if (PyArray_NDIM(yarr) != 3) {
            Py_CLEAR(yarr);
            PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError, "Expected 3 dimensional integrand");
            return NULL;
        }
    
        npy_intp * dims = PyArray_DIMS(yarr);
        npy_intp i,j,k,m;
        double * p;
    
        //initialize variable to hold result
        Py_complex result = {.real = 0, .imag = 0};
    
        if (iscomplex) {
            for (i=0;i<dims[0];i++) 
                for (j=0;j<dims[1];j++) 
                    for (k=0;k<dims[1];k++) {
                        p = (double*)PyArray_GETPTR3(yarr, i,j,k);
                        result.real += *p;
                        result.imag += *(p+1);
                    }
        } else {
            for (i=0;i<dims[0];i++) 
                for (j=0;j<dims[1];j++) 
                    for (k=0;k<dims[1];k++) {
                        p = (double*)PyArray_GETPTR3(yarr, i,j,k);
                        result.real += *p;
                    }
        }
    
        //multiply by step size
        result.real *= (dx*dy*dz);
        result.imag *= (dx*dy*dz);
    
        Py_CLEAR(yarr);
    
        //copy result into returnable type with new reference
        if (iscomplex) {
            return Py_BuildValue("D", &result);
        } else {
            return Py_BuildValue("d", result.real);
        }
    
    };
    

    Simply put that into a source file (we'll call it cintegrate.cxx along with the module definition stuff, inserted at the bottom:

    static PyMethodDef cintegrate_Methods[] = {
        {"integrate3",  integrate3, METH_VARARGS,
         "Pass 3D numpy array (double or complex) and dx,dy,dz step size. Returns Reimman integral"},
        {NULL, NULL, 0, NULL}        /* Sentinel */
    };
    
    
    static struct PyModuleDef module = {
       PyModuleDef_HEAD_INIT,
       "cintegrate",   /* name of module */
       NULL, /* module documentation, may be NULL */
       -1,       /* size of per-interpreter state of the module,
                    or -1 if the module keeps state in global variables. */
       cintegrate_Methods
    };
    

    Then compile that via setup.py much like Walter's boost example with just a couple obvious changes- replacing file.cc there with our file cintegrate.cxx, removing boost dependencies, and making sure the path to "numpy/arrayobject.h" is included.

    In python then you can use it like:

    import cintegrate
    import numpy as np
    
    arr = np.random.randn(4,8,16) + 1j*np.random.randn(4,8,16)
    
    # arbitrary step size dx = 1., y=0.5, dz = 0.25
    ans = cintegrate.integrate3(arr, 1.0, 0.5, .25)
    

    This specific code hasn't been tested but is mostly copied from working code.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题