OpenSSL Static Library too big, any alternative or way to reduce its size?

前端 未结 3 1609
臣服心动
臣服心动 2021-01-03 01:09

I have used pre-build static libs of OpenSSL 1.0, but it makes my binary too big, (increase its size by about 800Kb in release mode).

I do not need most of the featu

相关标签:
3条回答
  • 2021-01-03 01:48

    I think you want this page, particular the section on code size:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_TLS_implementations&oldid=585386367#Code_size_and_dependencies

    (dated December 2013)

    update: Alas no longer a part of the updated page.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-03 01:48

    You can try compiling it yourself with --ffunction-sections and --fdata-sections, which tells gcc to put each function and global data variable in a separate section inside the object.

    (When using static libraries, the linker copies the entire object which contains the needed function from the archive to the application.)

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2021-01-03 01:54

    OpenSSL does have a large number of compile-time options to control what features are built. I believe that the SSL functions use BIOs underneath, so you'll still need those, but there's a lot of other functionality you can probably go without (like ciphers you won't use, envelope encryption, S/MIME support...).

    I'm not sure how much it will reduce the binary size by, but it's worth a try.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题