what are the leading XSL-FO implementations? How do I decide among them?

Question

I\'m evaluating PDF rendering technologies. XSL-FO is our chosen path because its an open standard and our source data is XML. What experiences have people had with the var

Answer 1

Ecrion has the most advanced report designer. It's way above Antenna's tool, and you can see the actual XSL-FO that is being edited. This is important because you can use Ecrion's Designer with all XSL-FO formatters including FOP. Other vendors are trying to achieve a vendor lock-in to their own FO formatter.

Answer 2

Antennahouse is another major XSL-FO implementation:

Answer 3

Late entry, but to complete: I'm using XML2PDF Workstation from www.alt-soft.com - it's fast, cheap and does the job, even SVG and Bookmarks.

Answer 4

Ibex pdf creator is a good XSL-FO engine with Java and .NET implementations.

I have used their Java implementation and it did pretty much everything we needed and was performant. Their licensing model is really good, especially if you are building clients that need XSL-FO processing. You pay a per-developer fee, not a per-client distribution.

Antenna House and renderX. are the leaders in the XSL-FO space. They have great tools and overall support/implementation for the XSL-FO specification.

Regardless of which FO engine you decide on, it is helpful to have several available for development. Rendering through different FO engines helps test out your XSL-FO and determine if incorrect output is due to a problem with the rendering engine or with your XSL-FO.