values = [8160,8160,6160,22684,0,0,60720,1380,1380,57128]
how can I remove outliers like 0, 57218, 60720 and 22684?
Is there a library whic
This method actually fails if the set of your data contains duplicated values. E.g. 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 10
.
I struggled with it for a while, but then I discovered something called Grubbs'test. So far it seems reliable at least in my case.
Here's a link to demo (and source): http://xcatliu.com/grubbs/
This is an improved version of @james-peterson solution that updates the syntax to the current Javascript standard and adds a more robust way of finding the two quartiles (implemented according to formulas at https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interquartilsabstand_(Deskriptive_Statistik) ). It uses a faster way of copying the array (see http://jsben.ch/wQ9RU for a performance comparison) and still works for q1 = q3.
function filterOutliers(someArray) {
if(someArray.length < 4)
return someArray;
let values, q1, q3, iqr, maxValue, minValue;
values = someArray.slice().sort( (a, b) => a - b);//copy array fast and sort
if((values.length / 4) % 1 === 0){//find quartiles
q1 = 1/2 * (values[(values.length / 4)] + values[(values.length / 4) + 1]);
q3 = 1/2 * (values[(values.length * (3 / 4))] + values[(values.length * (3 / 4)) + 1]);
} else {
q1 = values[Math.floor(values.length / 4 + 1)];
q3 = values[Math.ceil(values.length * (3 / 4) + 1)];
}
iqr = q3 - q1;
maxValue = q3 + iqr * 1.5;
minValue = q1 - iqr * 1.5;
return values.filter((x) => (x >= minValue) && (x <= maxValue));
}
See this gist: https://gist.github.com/rmeissn/f5b42fb3e1386a46f60304a57b6d215a
I had some problems with the other two solutions. Problems like having NaN values as q1 and q3 because of wrong indexes. The array length needs to have an -1 because of the 0 index. Then it is checked if the index is a int or decimal, in the case of a decimal the value between two indexes is extracted.
function filterOutliers (someArray) {
if (someArray.length < 4) {
return someArray;
}
let values = someArray.slice().sort((a, b) => a - b); // copy array fast and sort
let q1 = getQuantile(values, 25);
let q3 = getQuantile(values, 75);
let iqr, maxValue, minValue;
iqr = q3 - q1;
maxValue = q3 + iqr * 1.5;
minValue = q1 - iqr * 1.5;
return values.filter((x) => (x >= minValue) && (x <= maxValue));
}
function getQuantile (array, quantile) {
// Get the index the quantile is at.
let index = quantile / 100.0 * (array.length - 1);
// Check if it has decimal places.
if (index % 1 === 0) {
return array[index];
} else {
// Get the lower index.
let lowerIndex = Math.floor(index);
// Get the remaining.
let remainder = index - lowerIndex;
// Add the remaining to the lowerindex value.
return array[lowerIndex] + remainder * (array[lowerIndex + 1] - array[lowerIndex]);
}
}
This all depends on your interpretation of what an "outlier" is. A common approach:
This is also the approach described by Wolfram's Mathworld.
This is easily wrapped up in a function :) I've tried to write the below clearly; obvious refactoring opportunities do exist. Note that your given sample contains no outlying values using this common approach.
function filterOutliers(someArray) {
// Copy the values, rather than operating on references to existing values
var values = someArray.concat();
// Then sort
values.sort( function(a, b) {
return a - b;
});
/* Then find a generous IQR. This is generous because if (values.length / 4)
* is not an int, then really you should average the two elements on either
* side to find q1.
*/
var q1 = values[Math.floor((values.length / 4))];
// Likewise for q3.
var q3 = values[Math.ceil((values.length * (3 / 4)))];
var iqr = q3 - q1;
// Then find min and max values
var maxValue = q3 + iqr*1.5;
var minValue = q1 - iqr*1.5;
// Then filter anything beyond or beneath these values.
var filteredValues = values.filter(function(x) {
return (x <= maxValue) && (x >= minValue);
});
// Then return
return filteredValues;
}
Here is the implementation to filter upper outliers from a given collection. This approach follows a similar methodology as the provided answers above.
The if
case will be checking the length of collection if it is 4n
or 4n + 1
. In that case, we need to get an average of two elements to have our quartiles.
Otherwise, in cases of 4n + 2
and 4n + 3
, we directly can access the upper/lower quartile.
const outlierDetector = collection => {
const size = collection.length;
let q1, q3;
if (size < 2) {
return collection;
}
const sortedCollection = collection.slice().sort((a, b) => a - b);
if ((size - 1) / 4 % 1 === 0 || size / 4 % 1 === 0) {
q1 = 1 / 2 * (sortedCollection[Math.floor(size / 4) - 1] + sortedCollection[Math.floor(size / 4)]);
q3 = 1 / 2 * (sortedCollection[Math.ceil(size * 3 / 4) - 1] + sortedCollection[Math.ceil(size * 3 / 4)]);
} else {
q1 = sortedCollection[Math.floor(size / 4)];
q3 = sortedCollection[Math.floor(size * 3 / 4)];
}
const iqr = q3 - q1;
const maxValue = q3 + iqr * 1.5;
return sortedCollection.filter(value => value >= maxValue);
};