I read post
C volatile variables and Cache Memory
But i am confused.
Question:
whether OS will take care itself OR
programmer has to
To clarify:
volatile
is a C concept and tells the compiler to fetch a variable each time from memory rather then use a "compiler-generated" cached version in registers or optimise certain code.
What may be causing confusion here is CPU caches vs software caches (a.k.a variables in registers).
The CPU/Hardware cache is 100% transparent to the program and the hardware makes sure that it is 100% synchronised. There is nothing to worry there, when you issue a load
from memory and the data comes from the CPU cache then it's the same data that is in the addressed memory.
Your compiler may decide though to "cache" frequent use variables in registers which can then go out of sync with memory because the hardware is unaware of those. This is what the volatile
keyword prevents. Common example:
int * lock;
while (*lock) {
// do work
// lock mot modified or accessed here
}
An optimising compiler will see that you are not using lock
in the loop and will convert this to:
if (*lock)
while (true) {
// do work
}
This is obviously not the behaviour you want if lock
is to be modified by e.g. another thread. SO you mark it volatile to prevent this:
volatile int * lock;
while (*lock) {
// do work
}
Hope this makes it a little clearer.
I read this wiki page volatile, it gives an example about how gcc optimize the non-volatile variables and how 'volatile' prevent gcc optimizing.
I noticed that after using 'volatile' to qualify the variables, gcc indeed not optimize away the 'volatile' variables, but everytime read/write operation, the generated instructions are using 'movl' to access. I mean, when 'movl' instruction emits a data address, how does the kernel or cpu or other parts judge whether to read it from cache or memory?
Sergey L. has mentioned that the following keypoints:
Your compiler may decide though to "cache" frequent use variables in registers which can then go out of sync with memory because the hardware is unaware of those. This is what the volatile keyword prevents.
As mentioned by Sergey L., now my understanding is 'volatile' only prevents compiler optimization relevant to 'software cache', i.e. put frequent using variables into registers rather than cpu cache, and 'volatile' cannot guarantee the visibility between different threads?
I am still really confused, maybe I still misunderstand that.