I am trying to modify a python program to be able to communicate with a C++ program using shared memory. The main responsibility of the python program is to read some video
Sorta, kinda shared memory. So not exactly what the OP wanted.
This works using memory mapped files. I do not claim high speed or efficiency in any way. These are just to show an example of it working.
$ python --version
Python 3.7.9
$ g++ --version
g++ (Ubuntu 9.3.0-17ubuntu1~20.04) 9.3.0
The C++ side only monitors the values it needs. The Python side only provides the values.
Note: the file name "pods.txt" must be the same in the C++ and python code.
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
int main(void)
{
// assume file exists
int fd = -1;
if ((fd = open("pods.txt", O_RDWR, 0)) == -1)
{
printf("unable to open pods.txt\n");
return 0;
}
// open the file in shared memory
char* shared = (char*) mmap(NULL, 8, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
// periodically read the file contents
while (true)
{
printf("0x%02X 0x%02X 0x%02X 0x%02X 0x%02X 0x%02X 0x%02X 0x%02X\n", shared[0], shared[1], shared[2], shared[3], shared[4], shared[5], shared[6], shared[7]);
sleep(1);
}
return 0;
}
The python side:
import mmap
import os
import time
fname = './pods.txt'
if not os.path.isfile(fname):
# create initial file
with open(fname, "w+b") as fd:
fd.write(b'\x01\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00')
# at this point, file exists, so memory map it
with open(fname, "r+b") as fd:
mm = mmap.mmap(fd.fileno(), 8, access=mmap.ACCESS_WRITE, offset=0)
# set one of the pods to true (== 0x01) all the rest to false
posn = 0
while True:
print(f'writing posn:{posn}')
# reset to the start of the file
mm.seek(0)
# write the true/false values, only one is true
for count in range(8):
curr = b'\x01' if count == posn else b'\x00'
mm.write(curr)
# admire the view
time.sleep(2)
# set up for the next position in the next loop
posn = (posn + 1) % 8
mm.close()
fd.close()
To run it, in terminal #1:
a.out # or whatever you called the C++ executable
0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00
0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00
0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
0x00 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
0x00 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
0x00 0x00 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
0x00 0x00 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
0x00 0x00 0x00 0x01 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x00
i.e. you should see the 0x01 move one step every couple of seconds because of the sleep(2) in the C++ code.
in terminal #2:
python my.py # or whatever you called the python file
writing posn:0
writing posn:1
writing posn:2
i.e. you should see the position change from 0 through 7 back to 0 again.
Perhaps shmget
and shmat
are not necessarily the most appropriate interfaces for you to be using. In a project I work on, we provide access to a daemon via a C and Python API using memory mapped files, which gives us a very fast way of accessing data
The order of operations goes somewhat like this:
door_call()
to tell the daemon to create a shared memory regionopen()
s and then mmap()
s that filedoor_return()
mmap()
s the file descriptor and associates consecutively-placed variables in a structure with that fdOur clients make use of a library to handle the first 5 steps above; the library comes with Python wrappers using ctypes to expose exactly which functions and data types are needed.
For your problem space, if it's just the python app which writes to your output queue then you can track which frames have been processed just in the python app. If both your python and c++ apps are writing to the output queue then that increases your level of difficulty and perhaps refactoring the overall application architecture would be a good investment.