发表新帖
发表新帖

SEO consequences of redirecting with META REFRESH

后端 未结
关注
2 1673
夕颜
夕颜 2020-12-31 12:49

Question: What are the SEO consequences of redirecting web traffic with a META REFRESH?

Details: I\'m working with an old static site that\'s migrating to a new addr

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 长发绾君心
    2020-12-31 13:24

    It's not ideal, but apparently it's ok:

    http://sebastians-pamphlets.com/google-and-yahoo-treat-undelayed-meta-refresh-as-301-redirect/

    Also read number 2 on this page:

    http://www.seomoz.org/blog/answers-to-the-seo-professionals-litmus-test

    0 讨论(0)
  • 名媛妹妹
    2020-12-31 13:29

    as i can not comment on the fact, if a 0sec meta refresh is treated as a 301 redirect, i would just go with the way google recommends. see http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=139394

    from http://www.oldsite.com/

    <head>
...
<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.newsite.com/" />
...
</head>

    from http://www.newsite.com/awesomepage.html

    <head>
...
<link rel="canonical" href="http://www.newsite.com/awesomepage" />
...
</head>

    and so on.

    cross domain canonicals are basically treated like HTTP 301 for googlebot. whatever you do with the user (i.e.: meta refresh, or just leave him/her on the old page) is optional (as long as it is not missleading).

    0 讨论(0)
 看不清?
提交回复
热议问题