Docker: MacOSX Expose Container ports to host machine

Question

In my job I working with docker and the option --net=host working like a charm forwarding the docker container ports to the machine. This allows me to adding gr

Answer 1

Your issue is most probably that you are using dockertoolbox or dhingy/dlite or anything else providing a full-fledged linux VM, which then hosts docker to run your container inside this VM. This VM has, of course, its own network stack and own IP on the host, and thats were your tools will have issues with. The exposed ports of the container are not exposed to OSX host localhost, but rather OSX Docker-VM-ip.

To solve those issues elegantly

Expose ports to OSX localhost from the container

1. First, use/install docker-for-mac https://docs.docker.com/engine/installation/mac/ instead of dockertoolbox or others. Its based on a special xhyve stack which reuses your hosts network stack
2. when you now do docker run -p 3306:3306 percona it will bind 3306 on the osx-host-localhost, thus every other osx-tool trying to attach to localhost:3306 will work ( very useful ) just as you have been used to it when you installed mysql using brew install mysql or likewise
3. If you experience performance issues with code shares on OSX with docker containers, check http://docker-sync.io - it is compatible with docker-for-mac ( hint: i am biased on this one )

---

Export ports from the OSX-host to a containter

You do not really export anything in particular, you rather make them accessable as a whole from all containers ( all ports of the OSX-host-localhost)

If you want to attach to a port you offered on the OSX host, from within a container, e.g. during a xdebug session were your IDE listens on port 9000 on the OSX-host-localhost and the container running FPM/PHP should attach to this osx-localhost:9000 on the mac, you need to do this: https://gist.github.com/EugenMayer/3019516e5a3b3a01b6eac88190327e7c

So you create a dummy loopback ip, so you can access your OSX-host ports from without containers using 10.254.254.254:9000 - this is portable and basically gives you all you need to develop like you have used to

---

So one gives you the connectivity to container-exposed ports to apps running on the mac and trying to connect to localhost:port

And the second the inverse, if something in the container wants to attach to a port on the host.

Answer 2

One workaround, mentioned in "Bind container ports to the host" would be to use -P:

(or --publish-all=true|false) to docker run which is a blanket operation that identifies every port with an EXPOSE line in the image’s Dockerfile or --expose <port> commandline flag and maps it to a host port somewhere within an ephemeral port range.
The docker port command then needs to be used to inspect created mapping.

So if your app can use docker port <CONTAINER> to retrieve the mapped port, you can add as many containers as you want and get the mapped ports that way (without needed an "explicit -p command for each port").

Answer 3

Not sure if docker for mac can support bi-directional connection later https://forums.docker.com/t/will-docker-for-mac-support-bi-directional-connection-between-host-and-container-in-the-future/19871

I have two solution:

1. you can write a simple wrapper script and pass the port you want to expose to the script
2. use vagrant to start a virtual machine with network under control.