I was wondering if in Java there is a function like the python range function.
range(4)
and it would return
[0,1,2,3]
What you can do to substitute the range in python in java can be done with the following code. NOTE: I am not going off of your code, I am just writing a small piece of code and showing it to you.
in python you would do.. . .
if -2 <= x <= 10:
print(x)
in java you would substitute this range and do. . ..
if(x >= -2 && x <= 10){
System.out.println("x")
}
By doing the above code in java, you don't need a range, but you have the -2 <= x <=10 range and split it into x >= -2 and x <= 10. It means the same thing, but the one I explained in java may take the compiler a longer time to read. So if you are using python go with the former's code format, and if you are using java, use the latter's code format.
If you really, really want to obtain an equivalent result in Java, you'll have to do some more work:
public int[] range(int start, int end, int step) {
int n = (int) Math.ceil((end-start)/(double)step);
int[] arange = new int[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
arange[i] = i*step+start;
return arange;
}
Now range(0, 4, 1)
will return the expected value, just like Python: [0, 1, 2, 3]
. Sadly there isn't a simpler way in Java, it's not a very expressive language, like Python.
As far as I know, there's not an equivalent function in java. But you can write it yourself:
public static int[] range(int n) {
int[] ans = new int[n];
int i;
for(i = 0; i < n; i++) {
ans[i] = i;
}
return ans;
}
Java 8 (2014) has added IntStream (similar to apache commons IntRange), so you don't need external lib now.
import java.util.stream.IntStream;
IntStream.range(0, 3).forEachOrdered(n -> {
System.out.println(n);
});
forEach
can be used in place of forEachOrdered
too if order is not important.
IntStream.range(0, 3).parallel()
can be used for loops to run in parallel
Use Apache Commons Lang:
new IntRange(0, 3).toArray();
I wouldn't normally advocate introducing external libraries for something so simple, but Apache Commons are so widely used that you probably already have it in your project!
Edit: I know its not necessarily as simple or fast as a for loop, but its a nice bit of syntactic sugar that makes the intent clear.
Edit: See @zengr's answer using IntStream
in Java 8 .
Without an external library, you can do the following. It will consume significantly less memory for big ranges than the current accepted answer, as there is no array created.
Have a class like this:
class Range implements Iterable<Integer> {
private int limit;
public Range(int limit) {
this.limit = limit;
}
@Override
public Iterator<Integer> iterator() {
final int max = limit;
return new Iterator<Integer>() {
private int current = 0;
@Override
public boolean hasNext() {
return current < max;
}
@Override
public Integer next() {
if (hasNext()) {
return current++;
} else {
throw new NoSuchElementException("Range reached the end");
}
}
@Override
public void remove() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Can't remove values from a Range");
}
};
}
}
and you can simply use it like this:
for (int i : new Range(5)) {
System.out.println(i);
}
you can even reuse it:
Range range5 = new Range(5);
for (int i : range5) {
System.out.println(i);
}
for (int i : range5) {
System.out.println(i);
}
As Henry Keiter pointed out in the comment below, we could add following method to the Range
class (or anywhere else):
public static Range range(int max) {
return new Range(max);
}
and then, in the other classes we can
import static package.name.Range.range;
and simply call
for (int i : range(5)) {
System.out.println(i);
}