Headless Chrome to print pdf

前端 未结 7 1394
渐次进展
渐次进展 2020-12-30 15:33

I am trying to use Headless feature of the Chrome to convert a html to pdf. However, i am not getting output at all. Console doesn\'t show any error as well. I am running be

相关标签:
7条回答
  • 2020-12-30 15:33

    Do not forget to open your terminal/cmd with admin rights :) Otherwise it will just not save the file at all.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-30 15:33

    I was missing "=" after print-to-pdf command.

    The correct command is:

    chrome --headless --disable-gpu --print-to-pdf="C:/temp/name.pdf" https://www.google.com/
    

    Now it is working.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-30 15:44

    extending the brilliantly simple answer by suraj, I created a small function that is in my sourced path so it works like a CLI tool:

    function webtopdf(){
        chromium-browser --headless --disable-gpu --print-to-pdf=$2 $1
    }
    

    so a quick

    webtopdf https://goo.com/some-article some-article.pdf
    

    does the job for me now

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-30 15:46

    This worked for me in windows

    start chrome --headless --disable-gpu --print-to-pdf=C:\Users\username\pdfs\chrome.pdf --no-margins https://www.google.com

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-30 15:51

    This is working:

    chrome --headless --disable-gpu --print-to-pdf=file1.pdf https://www.google.co.in/
    

    creates file in the folder: C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\61.0.3163.100.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-30 15:53

    Command Line --print-to-pdf

    By default, --print-to-pdf attempts to create a PDF in the User Directory. By default, that user directory is where the actual chrome binary is stored, which is the specific version folder for the version you're running - for example, "C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\61.0.3163.100". And, by default... Chrome is not allowed to write to this folder. You can watch it try, and fail, by adding --enable-logging to your command.

    So unfortunately, by default, this command fails.*

    You can solve this by either providing a path in the argument, where Chrome can write - like

    --print-to-pdf="C:\Users\Jane\test.pdf"
    

    Or, you can change the User Directory:

    --user-data-dir="C:\Users\Jane"
    

    One reason you might prefer to change the User Directory is if you want the PDF to automatically receive its name from the webpage; Chrome looks at the title tag and then dumps it like <title>My Page</title> => My-Page.pdf

    *I think this default behavior is super confusing, and should be filed as a bug against Chrome. However, apparently part of the Chrome team is outright opposed to the mere existence of this command line option, and instead believe it would be better to force everyone using it to get a node.js build going with Puppeteer and the flag removed outright.

    Limitations of Command Line on Windows

    Invoking chrome in this way will work fine for example in a local dev env on IIS Express with Visual Studio, but it will fail, even in headless mode, on a server running IIS, because IIS users are not given interactive/desktop permissions, and the way chrome grabs this PDF actually requires interactive/desktop permissions. There are complicated ways to provide those permissions, but anyplace you read up on how begins with DON'T PROVIDE INTERACTIVE/DESKTOP PERMISSIONS. Further, the above risk of Chrome one day getting rid of the command-line makes working even harder to get it working an iffy proposition.

    Alternatives to chrome command line

    wkhtmltopdf

    Behind the scenes Chrome simply uses wkhtmltopdf. I haven't tried it but it's likely this will get the job done. The one minor risk is that when producing PDFs in Chrome, testing is obvious: View the page in Chrome. Open Print Preview if you're nervous. In wkhtmltopdf, it's actually a different build of Chromium, and that may produce rendering differences. Maybe.

    Selenium

    Another alternative is to get ahead of the group looking to get rid of --print-to-pdf and use the browser dev API (via Selenium) as they prefer.**

    private static void pdfSeleniumImpl(string url, string pdfPath)
    {
        var options = new OpenQA.Selenium.Chrome.ChromeOptions();
        options.AddArgument("headless");
    
        using (var chrome = new OpenQA.Selenium.Chrome.ChromeDriver(options))
        {
            chrome.Url = url;
    
            var printToPdfOpts = new Dictionary<string, object>();
            var resultDict = (Dictionary<string, object>)
                chrome.ExecuteChromeCommandWithResult(
                    "Page.printToPDF", printToPdfOpts);
            dynamic result = new DDict(resultDict);
            string data = result.data;
            var pdfFile = Convert.FromBase64String(data);
            System.IO.File.WriteAllBytes(pdfPath, pdfFile);
        }
    }
    

    The DDict above is the GracefulDynamicDictionary from another of my answers.

    https://www.nuget.org/packages/GracefulDynamicDictionary/

    https://github.com/b9chris/GracefulDynamicDictionary

    https://stackoverflow.com/a/24192518/176877

    Ideally this would be async, since all the calls to Selenium are actually network commands, and writing that file could take a lot of Disk IO. The data returned from Chrome is actually a Stream as well. However Selenium's conventionally used library does not use async at all unfortunately, so it would take upgrading that library or identifying a solid async Selenium library for .Net to really do this right.

    https://github.com/puppeteer/puppeteer/blob/master/lib/Page.js#L1007

    https://chromedevtools.github.io/devtools-protocol/tot/Page/#method-printToPDF

    **The Page.pdf chrome Dev API command is also deprecated, so if that contingent gets their way, neither the command line nor the Dev API will work. That said it looks like those lobbying to wreck it gave up 2 years ago.

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题