Oracle Sequence nextval is jumping number back and forth

前端 未结 2 1177
北海茫月
北海茫月 2020-12-30 08:54

I created a new table and a new sequence, I have two C# web services trying to insert records into this table using same query utilizing mySequence.nextval (and

相关标签:
2条回答
  • 2020-12-30 09:45

    I will wager that your database is running RAC (Real Application Clusters). Assuming that is the case and that you create the sequence with all the default settings, that's the expected behavior.

    The default setting is to cache 20 values. Each node in the RAC cluster, by default, will have a separate cache. Assuming that you have a cluster with two nodes A and B, the first time a nextval is requested on A, A will cache values 1-20 and return a value of 1. If the next request for a nextval is made on B, B will cache values 21-40 and return a value of 21. From there, the value you get will depend on the node that your connection happens to be running on.

    Generally, this shouldn't be a problem. Sequences generate unique numbers. The numbers generally need not be consecutive. If you really need values to be returned sequentially because you are doing something like ordering by the sequence-generated value to determine the "first" or "last" row, you can use the ORDER clause when you create the sequence to force values to be returned in order. That has a negative performance implication in a RAC database, however, because it increases the amount of communication that needs to go on between the nodes to synchronize the values being returned. If you need to determine the "first" or "last" row, it's generally better to add a date or a timestamp column to the table and order by that rather than assuming that the primary key is generated sequentially.

    0 讨论(0)
  • 2020-12-30 09:56

    From the docs...

    Sequence numbers are generated independently of tables, so the same sequence can be used for one or for multiple tables. It is possible that individual sequence numbers will appear to be skipped, because they were generated and used in a transaction that ultimately rolled back. Additionally, a single user may not realize that other users are drawing from the same sequence.

    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/statements_6015.htm#SQLRF01314

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题