In calculate if two arbitrary regular expressions have any overlapping solutions (assuming it\'s possible).
For example these two regular expressions can be shown to
I've created a PHP implementation of Patrick87 answer. In addition to implementing the Intersection via Cartesian Product Machine, I've also implemented an alterative algorithm for finding Intersections of DFAs using De Morgan.
Intersection( DFA_1, DFA_2 ) === ! UNION( ! DFA_1, ! DFA_2 )
* ! is defined as negation
This works very well for DFAs as the negation of a fully defined DFA (those with every possible transition state defined) is just to add all non-final states to the final state set and remove all current final states from the final state set (non-final -> final, final -> non->final). Union of DFA can be done easily by turning them into a NFA and then creating a new starting node that connects the unioned DFA's old start nodes by lambda transforms.
In addition to solving the intersection problem, the library I created is also able to determinize a NFA to a DFA and convert Regex to NFA.
EDIT:
I have created a webapp that allows this sort of transformations on regex languagues using what I learned form this question (and others).
It is not in the domain of the halting problem; deciding whether the intersection of regular languages is empty or not can be solved as follows:
Each of those things can be algorithmically done and/or checked. Also, naturally, once you have a DFA recognizing the intersection of your languages, you can construct a regex to match the language. And if you start out with a regex, you can make a DFA. This is definitely computable.
EDIT:
So to build a Cartesian Product Machine, you need two DFAs. Let M1 = (E, q0, Q1, A1, f1) and M2 = (E, q0', Q2, A2, f2). In both cases, E is the input alphabet, q0 is the start state, Q is the set of all states, A is the set of accepting states, and f is the transition function. Construct M3 where...
Provided I didn't make any mistakes, L(M3) = L(M1) intersect L(M2). Neat, huh?