SQL Select 'n' records without a Table

Question

Is there a way of selecting a specific number of rows without creating a table. e.g. if i use the following:

SELECT 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10


        

Answer 1

Using PIVOT (for some cases it would be overkill)

DECLARE @Items TABLE(a int, b int, c int, d int, e int); 

INSERT INTO @Items
VALUES(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)

SELECT Items 
FROM @Items as p 
UNPIVOT     
(Items FOR Seq IN          
([a], [b], [c], [d], [e]) ) AS unpvt 

Answer 2

You can use a recursive CTE to generate an arbitrary sequence of numbers in T-SQL like so:

DECLARE @start INT = 1;
DECLARE @end INT = 10;

WITH numbers AS (
    SELECT @start AS number
    UNION ALL
    SELECT number + 1 
    FROM  numbers
    WHERE number < @end
)
SELECT *
FROM numbers
OPTION (MAXRECURSION 0);

Answer 3

This is a good way if you need a long list (so you don't need lots of UNIONstatements:

WITH CTE_Numbers AS (
    SELECT n = 1
    UNION ALL
    SELECT n + 1 FROM CTE_Numbers WHERE n < 10 
)
SELECT n FROM CTE_Numbers

Answer 4

Using spt_values table:

SELECT TOP (1000) n = ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY number) 
FROM [master]..spt_values ORDER BY n;

Or if the value needed is less than 1k:

SELECT DISTINCT n = number FROM master..[spt_values] WHERE number BETWEEN 1 AND 1000;

This is a table that is used by internal stored procedures for various purposes. Its use online seems to be quite prevalent, even though it is undocumented, unsupported, it may disappear one day, and because it only contains a finite, non-unique, and non-contiguous set of values. There are 2,164 unique and 2,508 total values in SQL Server 2008 R2; in 2012 there are 2,167 unique and 2,515 total. This includes duplicates, negative values, and even if using DISTINCT, plenty of gaps once you get beyond the number 2,048. So the workaround is to use ROW_NUMBER() to generate a contiguous sequence, starting at 1, based on the values in the table.

In addition, to aid more values than 2k records, you could join the table with itself, but in common cases, that table itself is enough.

Performance wise, it shouldn't be too bad (generating a million records, it took 10 seconds on my laptop), and the query is quite easy to read.

Source: http://sqlperformance.com/2013/01/t-sql-queries/generate-a-set-1

Answer 5

SELECT 1
UNION 
SELECT 2
UNION
...
UNION
SELECT 10 ;

Answer 6

If you have a fixed number of rows, you can try:

SELECT 1
UNION
SELECT 2
UNION
SELECT 3
UNION
SELECT 4
UNION
SELECT 5
UNION
SELECT 6
UNION
SELECT 7
UNION
SELECT 8
UNION
SELECT 9
UNION
SELECT 10