I have some difficulties understanding how Boost.MultiIndex is implemented. Lets say I have the following:
typedef multi_index_container<
employee,
Actually I do not think it is.
Based on what is located in detail/node_type.hpp
. It seems to me that like a std::map
the node will contain both the value and the index. Except that in this case the various indices differ from one another and thus the node interleaving would actually differ depending on the index you're following.
I am not sure about this though, Boost headers are definitely hard to parse, however it would make sense if you think in term of memory:
I would appreciate a definitive answer though, if anyone knows about the gore.
Conceptually, yes.
From what I understand of Boost.MultiIndex (I've used it, but not seen the implementation), your example with two ordered_unique
indices will indeed create two sorted associative containers (like std::map
) which store pointers/references/indices into a common set of employee
s.
In any case, every employee
is stored only once in the multi-indexed container, whereas a combination of map<string,employee>
and map<int,employee>
would store every employee twice.
It may very well be that there is indeed a (dynamic) array inside some multi-indexed containers, but there is no guarantee that this is true:
[Random access indices] do not provide memory contiguity, a property of
std::vector
s by which elements are stored adjacent to one another in a single block of memory.
Also, Boost.Bimap is based on Boost.MultiIndex and the former allows for different representations of its "backbone" structure.
A short explanation on the underlying structure is given here, quoted below:
The implementation is based on nodes interlinked with pointers, just as say your favorite std::set
implementation. I'll elaborate a bit on this: A std::set
is usually implemented as an rb-tree where nodes look like
struct node
{
// header
color c;
pointer parent,left,right;
// payload
value_type value;
};
Well, a multi_index_container
's node is basically a "multinode" with as many headers as indices as well as the payload. For instance, a multi_index_container
with two so-called ordered indices uses an internal node that looks like
struct node
{
// header index #0
color c0;
pointer parent0,left0,right0;
// header index #1
color c1;
pointer parent1,left1,right2;
// payload
value_type value;
};
(The reality is more complicated, these nodes are generated through some metaprogramming etc. but you get the idea) [...]