QUnit, Sinon.js & Backbone unit test frustration: sinon spy appears to fail to detect Backbone Model event callbacks

后端 未结 1 790
暖寄归人
暖寄归人 2020-12-29 15:26

In the following unit test code:

TestModel = Backbone.Model.extend({
    defaults: {
        \'selection\': null
    },
    initialize: function() {
      th         


        
相关标签:
1条回答
  • 2020-12-29 15:47

    Calling this.spy(this.testModel, 'doSomething') replaces the testModel.doSomething method with a new wrapper method:

    var spy = sinon.spy(object, "method");

    Creates a spy for object.method and replaces the original method with the spy.

    So this.spy(this.testModel, 'doSomething') is effectively doing something like this:

    var m = this.testModel.doSomething;
    this.testModel.doSomething = function() {
        // Spying stuff goes here...
        return m.apply(this, arguments);
    };
    

    This means that testModel.doSomething is a different function when you bind the event handler in initialize:

    this.bind('change:selection', this.doSomething);
    

    than it is after you've attached your spying. The Backbone event dispatcher will call the original doSomething method but that one doesn't have the Sinon instrumentation. When you call doSomething manually, you're calling the new function that spy added and that one does have the Sinon instrumentation.

    If you want to use Sinon to test your Backbone events, then you'll have to arrange to have the Sinon spy call applied to the model before you bind any event handlers and that probably means hooking into initialize.

    Maybe you could monkey-patch your model's initialize to add the necessary spy calls before it binds any event handlers:

    var init = Model.prototype.initialize;
    Model.prototype.initialize = function() {
        // Set up the Spy stuff...
        init.apply(this, arguments);
    };
    

    Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/C4fnX/1/

    You could also try subclassing your model with something like:

    var Model = Backbone.Model.extend({});
    var TestModel = Model.extend({
        initialize: function() {
            // Set up the Spy stuff...
            Model.prototype.initialize.apply(this, arguments);
        }
    });
    

    And then use TestModel instead of Model, this would give you an instrumented version of Model in TestModel without having to include a bunch of test-specific code inside your normal production-ready Model. The downside is that anything else that uses Model would need to be subclassed/patched/... to use TestModel instead.

    Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/yH3FE/1/

    You might be able to get around the TestModel problem with:

    var OriginalModel = Model;
    Model = Model.extend({
        initialize: function() {
            // Set up the Spy stuff...
            OriginalModel.prototype.initialize.apply(this, arguments);
        }
    });
    

    but you'd have to get the ordering right to make sure that everyone used the new Model rather than the old one.

    Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/ambiguous/u3vgF/1/

    0 讨论(0)
提交回复
热议问题