I\'m using virtualenv to switch my python dev env. But when I run workon my_env
, I meet such error message:
Error: deactivate must be sourced. R
You can edit /usr/local/bin/virtualenvwrapper.sh to make deactivate
point to an absolute path to whatever deactivate
it is supposed to be referencing.
In anaconda activate
is an executable script located in the anaconda bin
directory, but is a function in in virtualenvwrapper.sh
. So this is sort of a namespace collision problem, but also a case of overlap in functionality.
Anacondas is a python distribution and – among many other things – has support for dealing with virtual environment via conda env
while the virtualenvwrapper is focused on working with different virtual environments. Just renaming the anaconda/bin/activate script is a brittle solution and may break conda
.
The code of virtualenvwrapper.sh
(function workon
) executes deactivate
which happens to use the anaconda script. This script returns an error. The workon
code then goes on and removes the deactivate
name and sources its own deactivate
and also creates a deactivate
function on the fly.
In summary, it does the right thing and the "error" can be viewed more as a warning. If you want to make it go away you can modify the workon function (search for the line # Deactivate any current environment "destructively"
)
deactivate
-->
deactivate >/dev/null 2>&1
(I have suggested this change to the virtualenvwrapper maintainer)
I agree with the comment by @FredrikHedman that renaming scripts in the anaconda/miniconda bin
directory has the potential to be fragile. His full post led me to what I feel is a more robust answer. (Thanks!)
Rather than simply throwing away any errors thrown by calling deactivate
, we could simply condition that call on whether the function would be called versus the file. As mentioned, virtualenv and virtualenvwrapper create a function named deactivate
; the *condas call a script file of the same name.
So, in the virtualenvwrapper.sh
script, we can change the following two lines which test for whether deactivate
is merely callable:
type deactivate >/dev/null 2>&1
if [ $? -eq 0 ]
with the stricter test for whether it's a shell function:
if [ -n $ZSH_VERSION ] ; then
nametype="$(type -w deactivate)"
else
nametype="$(type -t deactivate)"
fi
if [ "${nametype##* }" == "function" ]
This change avoids triggering the spurious error noted in the original question, but doesn't risk redirecting other useful errors or output into silent oblivion.
Note the variable substitution on nametype
in the comparison. This is because the output of type -w
under zsh
returns something like "name: type
" as opposed to type -t
under bash
which returns simply "type
". The substitution deletes everything up to the last space character, if any spaces exist, leaving only the type value. This harmlessly does nothing in bash
.
(Thanks to @toprak for the zsh
test and for the correct flag, type -w
, under zsh. I look forward to more cross-shell coding tips!)
As ever, I appreciate constructive feedback and comments!
One solution which works for me is to rename deactivate
in Anaconda's bin:
mv deactivate conda-deactivate
As I do not have enough reputations to add a comment: Thomas Capote's suggestion is fine (thx 4 that), except "zsh" does not have a "-t" option for the build-in command "type". Therefore its necessary to add another conditional statement to get desired result for "nametype":
# Anaconda workaround for "source deactivate" message:
# Start of workaround:
#type deactivate >/dev/null 2>&1
#if [ $? -eq 0 ]
if [ -n $ZSH_VERSION ] ; then
nametype="$(type -w deactivate)"
else
nametype="$(type -t deactivate)"
fi
if [ "${nametype##* }" == "function" ]
# End of workaround
Hope it helps other zsh users.