I have strange a memory corruption problem. After many hours debugging and trying I think I found something.
For example: I do a simple string assignment:
Just for your information (in case some else has same problem too): we did an upgrade of our software for a customer, and the complete touchscreen locked up when our application was started! Windows was completely frozen! The pc had to be restarted (power off). It took some time to figure out the cause of the complete freeze.
Fortunately we had one (only 1!) stacktrace of an AV in FastMove.LargeSSEMove. I disabled the usage of SSE in fastmove, and the problem is gone.
By the way: touchscreen has an VIA Nehemiah cpu with an S3 chipset.
So not only you can get memory corruptions when using the FPU, but also a complete freeze!
I haven't seen this particular issue, but Move can definitely get messed up if the FPU is in a bad state. Cisco's VPN driver can screw things up horribly, even if you're not doing anything network related.
http://brianorr.blogspot.com/2006/11/intel-pentium-d-floating-point-unit.html [broken]
https://web.archive.org/web/20160601043520/http://www.dankohn.com/archives/343
http://blog.excastle.com/2007/08/28/delphi-bug-of-the-day-fpu-stack-leak/ (comments by Ritchie Annand)
In our case we detect the buggy VPN driver and swap out Move and FillChar with the Delphi 7 versions, replace IntToStr with a Pascal version (Int64-version uses the FPU), and, since we're using FastMM, we disable its custom fixed size move routines too, since they're even more susceptible than System.Move.
For those still interested in this: There's yet another possible cause of problems:
Move
.I had the pleasure to run into that bug today, luckily enough I had a reproducible test case. The issue is this piece of code:
* ***** BEGIN LICENSE BLOCK *****
*
* The assembly function Move is licensed under the CodeGear license terms.
*
* The initial developer of the original code is Fastcode
*
* Portions created by the initial developer are Copyright (C) 2002-2004
* the initial developer. All Rights Reserved.
*
* Contributor(s): John O'Harrow
*
* ***** END LICENSE BLOCK ***** *)
// ... some less interesting parts omitted ...
@@LargeMove:
JNG @@LargeDone {Count < 0}
CMP EAX, EDX
JA @@LargeForwardMove
// the following overlap test is broken
// when size>uint(destaddr), EDX underflows to $FFxxxxxx, in which case
// we jump to @LargeForwardMove even if a backward loop would be appropriate
// this will effectively shred everything at EDX + size
SUB EDX, ECX // when this underflows ...
CMP EAX, EDX // ... we also get CF=1 here (EDX is usually < $FFxxxxxx)
LEA EDX, [EDX+ECX] // (does not affect flags)
JNA @@LargeForwardMove // ... CF=1 so let's jump into disaster!
SUB ECX, 8 {Backward Move}
PUSH ECX
FILD QWORD PTR [EAX+ECX] {Last 8}
FILD QWORD PTR [EAX] {First 8}
ADD ECX, EDX
AND ECX, -8 {8-Byte Align Writes}
SUB ECX, EDX
It might be a bug in your video driver that does not preserve the 8087 control word when it performs the StretchBlt operation.
In the past I have seen similar behaviour when using certain printer drivers. They think they own the 8087 CW and are wrong...
Note the default value of the 8087 CW in Delphi seems $1372; for a more detailed explanation of the CW values, see this article: it also explains a situation that Michael Justin described when his 8087CW got hosed.
--jeroen