I have a signal of electromyographical data that I am supposed (scientific papers\' explicit recommendation) to smooth using RMS.
I have the following working code,
It is possible to use convolution to perform the operation you are referring to. I did it a few times for processing EEG signals as well.
import numpy as np
def window_rms(a, window_size):
a2 = np.power(a,2)
window = np.ones(window_size)/float(window_size)
return np.sqrt(np.convolve(a2, window, 'valid'))
Breaking it down, the np.power(a, 2)
part makes a new array with the same dimension as a
, but where each value is squared. np.ones(window_size)/float(window_size)
produces an array or length window_size
where each element is 1/window_size
. So the convolution effectively produces a new array where each element i
is equal to
(a[i]^2 + a[i+1]^2 + … + a[i+window_size]^2)/window_size
which is the RMS value of the array elements within the moving window. It should perform really well this way.
Note, though, that np.power(a, 2)
produces a new array of same dimension. If a
is really large, I mean sufficiently large that it cannot fit twice in memory, you might need a strategy where each element are modified in place. Also, the 'valid'
argument specifies to discard border effects, resulting in a smaller array produced by np.convolve()
. You could keep it all by specifying 'same'
instead (see documentation).
I found my machine struggling with convolve, so I propose the following solution:
Compute Moving RMS Window Quickly
Suppose we have analog voltage samples a0 ... a99 (one hundred samples) and we need to take moving RMS of 10 samples through them.
The window will scan initially from elements a0 to a9 (ten samples) to get rms0.
# rms = [rms0, rms1, ... rms99-9] (total of 91 elements in list):
(rms0)^2 = (1/10) (a0^2 + ... + a9^2) # --- (note 1)
(rms1)^2 = (1/10) (... a1^2 + ... + a9^2 + a10^2) # window moved a step, a0 falls out, a10 comes in
(rms2)^2 = (1/10) ( a2^2 + ... + a10^2 + a11^2) # window moved another step, a1 falls out, a11 comes in
...
Simplifying it: We havea = [a0, ... a99]
To create moving RMS of 10 samples, we can take sqrt of the addition of 10 a^2
's and multiplied by 1/10.
In other words, if we have
p = (1/10) * a^2 = 1/10 * [a0^2, ... a99^2]
To get rms^2
simply add a group of 10 p's.
Let's have an acummulator acu:
acu = p0 + ... p8 # (as in note 1 above)
Then we can have
rms0^2 = p0 + ... p8 + p9
= acu + p9
rms1^2 = acu + p9 + p10 - p0
rms2^2 = acu + p9 + p10 + p11 - p0 - p1
...
we can create:
V0 = [acu, 0, 0, ... 0]
V1 = [ p9, p10, p11, .... p99] -- len=91
V2 = [ 0, -p0, -p1, ... -p89] -- len=91
V3 = V0 + V1 + V2
if we run
itertools.accumulate(V3)
we will get rms array
Code:
import numpy as np
from itertools import accumulate
a2 = np.power(in_ch, 2) / tm_w # create array of p, in_ch is samples, tm_w is window length
v1 = np.array(a2[tm_w - 1 : ]) # v1 = [p9, p10, ...]
v2 = np.append([0], a2[0 : len(a2) - tm_w]) # v2 = [0, p0, ...]
acu = list(accumulate(a2[0 : tm_w - 1])) # get initial accumulation (acu) of the window - 1
v1[0] = v1[0] + acu[-1] # rms element #1 will be at end of window and contains the accumulation
rmspw2 = list(accumulate(v1 - v2))
rms = np.power(rmspw2, 0.5)
I can compute an array of 128 Mega samples in less than 1 minute.
Since this is not a linear transformation, I don't believe it is possible to use np.convolve().
Here's a function which should do what you want. Note that the first element of the returned array is the rms of the first full window; i.e. for the array a
in the example, the return array is the rms of the subwindows [1,2],[2,3],[3,4],[4,5]
and does not include the partial windows [1]
and [5]
.
>>> def window_rms(a, window_size=2):
>>> return np.sqrt(sum([a[window_size-i-1:len(a)-i]**2 for i in range(window_size-1)])/window_size)
>>> a = np.array([1,2,3,4,5])
>>> window_rms(a)
array([ 1.41421356, 2.44948974, 3.46410162, 4.47213595])