Let\'s assume there is a list a = [1, 3, 5, 6, 8]
.
I want to apply some transformation on that list and I want to avoid doing it sequentially, so someth
To make compatible with Python3
def map_fn(data):
idx, el = data
return idx*el
my_list = [2,3,5,7]
print(list(map(map_fn, list(enumerate(my_list)))))
You can use enumerate()
:
a = [1, 3, 5, 6, 8]
answer = map(lambda (idx, value): idx*value, enumerate(a))
print(answer)
Output
[0, 3, 10, 18, 32]
To extend Martijn Pieters' excellent answer, you could also use list comprehensions in combination with enumerate
:
>>> a = [1, 3, 5, 6, 8]
>>> [i * v for i, v in enumerate(a)]
[0, 3, 10, 18, 32]
or
[mapfunction(i, v) for i, v in enumerate(a)]
I feel list comprehensions are often more readable than map
/lambda
constructs. When using a named mapping function that accepts the (i, v)
tuple directly, map
probably wins though.
# Python3
map(lambda args: print(args[0],args[1]) ,enumerate(a_list))
# use arg list, just get the result with index
# Python2
map(lambda index,content: print(index,content) ,enumerate(a_list))
Use the enumerate() function to add indices:
map(function, enumerate(a))
Your function will be passed a tuple, with (index, value)
. In Python 2, you can specify that Python unpack the tuple for you in the function signature:
map(lambda (i, el): i * el, enumerate(a))
Note the (i, el)
tuple in the lambda argument specification. You can do the same in a def
statement:
def mapfunction((i, el)):
return i * el
map(mapfunction, enumerate(a))
To make way for other function signature features such as annotations, tuple unpacking in function arguments has been removed from Python 3.
Demo:
>>> a = [1, 3, 5, 6, 8]
>>> def mapfunction((i, el)):
... return i * el
...
>>> map(lambda (i, el): i * el, enumerate(a))
[0, 3, 10, 18, 32]
>>> map(mapfunction, enumerate(a))
[0, 3, 10, 18, 32]