Multiple Simultaneous SQL Connection Timeouts In Multithreaded Windows Service

Question

I have a multithreaded Windows Service I\'ve developed with VS 2010 (.NET 4.0) which can have anywhere from a few to a few dozen threads, each retrieving data from a slow se

Answer 1

According to the MSDN Blog post just created today (hooray for Google!):

Microsoft has confirmed that this is a problem in the current release of ADO.NET. This issue will be fixed in ADO.NET version, ships with Visual Studio 2011.

In the meantime, we request to use the following workarounds:

1. Increase the connection string timeout to 150 sec. This will give the first attempt enough time to connect( 150* .08=12 sec)

2. Add MinPool Size=20 in the connection string. This will always maintain a minimum of 20 connections in the pool and there will be less chances of creating new connection, thus reducing the chance of this error.

3. Improve the network performance. Update your NIC drivers to the latest firmware version. We have seen network latency when your NIC card is not compatible with certain Scalable Networking Pack settings. If you are on Windows Vista SP1 or above you may also consider disabling Receive Window Auto-Tuning. If you have NIC teaming enabled, disabling it would be a good option.

The post itself is an interesting read, talking about a TCP/IP connection retry algorithm. And kudos to all the folks who said "hey this looks like it's related to mirroring..."! And note the comment about this being "because of slow response from SQL Server or due to network delays".

UGH!!!

Thanks to everyone who posted. Now we must all ask for a patch to the .NET Framework (or some other ADO.NET patching mechanism), so we don't have to wait for (and buy) Visual Studio 11...

Answer 2

I get this every once in a while on this old database server that we have (coming up on 10 years old now). When it does happen though it's because something is hammering that thing with connections/queries constantly. My guess is that you'll find that when it happens the database server is under load (or a high number of connections or something along those lines) Anyway, in my experience if you can optimize the code, optimize the database, getting a beefier database server, etc. all helps. Another thing you can do, which Piotr suggests, is simply up the timeout for the connection. I'd still go through and optimize some stuff though (should help in the long run).

Answer 3

I have been able to somewhat reliably reproduce this problem. I have a service that when a processing job is requested it kicks off processing in a new appdomain / thread. This thread will execute 10 to 16 database queries simultaneously. When I run 30 of these jobs one after another then a random one or two of the jobs will crash with the timeout error.

I changed the connection string to turn off Connection Pooling with Pooling=false and then the error changed to the following. This gets thrown 3 or 4 times inside an aggregate exception, since the connections are happening inside a Parallel.For

System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Timeout expired.  The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding.
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning()
   at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadSniError(TdsParserStateObject stateObj, UInt32 error)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadSni(DbAsyncResult asyncResult, TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadNetworkPacket()
   at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ConsumePreLoginHandshake(Boolean encrypt, Boolean trustServerCert, Boolean& marsCapable)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Connect(ServerInfo serverInfo, SqlInternalConnectionTds connHandler, Boolean ignoreSniOpenTimeout, Int64 timerExpire, Boolean encrypt, Boolean trustServerCert, Boolean integratedSecurity)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.AttemptOneLogin(ServerInfo serverInfo, String newPassword, Boolean ignoreSniOpenTimeout, TimeoutTimer timeout, SqlConnection owningObject)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.LoginWithFailover(Boolean useFailoverHost, ServerInfo primaryServerInfo, String failoverHost, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance, SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, TimeoutTimer timeout)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, TimeoutTimer timeout, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection)
   at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreateNonPooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPoolGroup poolGroup)
   at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection)
   at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory)
   at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open()
   at Tps.PowerTools.CoreEngine.V5.DataAccess.DataContext.ExecuteQuery(PtQuery query, ValueStore`1 store, String readerDescription) in C:\SourceCode\Tps.PowerToolsV1\Trunk\Libraries\CoreEngine\CoreEngine.V5\DataAccess\DataContext.cs:line 326
   at Tps.PowerTools.CoreEngine.V5.DataAccess.DataContext.<StockHistoricalData>b__15(PtQuery query) in C:\SourceCode\Tps.PowerToolsV1\Trunk\Libraries\CoreEngine\CoreEngine.V5\DataAccess\DataContext.cs:line 302
   at System.Threading.Tasks.Parallel.<>c__DisplayClass32`2.<PartitionerForEachWorker>b__30()
   at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.InnerInvokeWithArg(Task childTask)
   at System.Threading.Tasks.Task.<>c__DisplayClass7.<ExecuteSelfReplicating>b__6(Object )

Answer 4

Optimizing the queries you are executing on the remote server will always help. Time each query and look for long running ones. If you are just doing reads then use the (NOLOCK) hint on the SELECT statements. This was a life saver for me. Just read up on it to make sure it is appropriate in your application. If you have access to the remote database make sure the indexes are not to fragmented. This will cause a major slow down in query execution. Make sure indexes are rebuilt/reorganized as part of the SQL maintenance plan. Add new indexes where appropriate.

Extending the timeout may make matters worse. If you let queries run longer then, potentially, more queries will time out. The timeout is there to protect the server and other clients accessing it. Bumping it up a little is not a huge deal but you don't want queries running for a long time killing the server.

Answer 5

Connection timeout is a different thing than command timeout. Command timeout applies to situation when you have connection established, but due to some internal reasons server cannot return any results within required time. Default command timeout is 30 seconds. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.sqlclient.sqlcommand.commandtimeout.aspx

Try to specify connection timeout in the connection string. Default value is 15 seconds what may be the reason of the issue you see. You can also specify connection timeout in code: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.data.sqlclient.sqlconnection.connectiontimeout.aspx