nodejs parallel callback design pattern

Question

I\'m trying to find a good pattern to execute a bunch of parallel tasks.

Let me define some task to exemplify. Tasks a, b, c, d, e, f, g execute as

Answer 1

yeah, look at flow control module, like step, chain, or flow ~ and i think there is something like that in underscore.js too

Answer 2

Try to look at step module and this article.

Answer 3

You should check out Step ( https://github.com/creationix/step ). It's just over a hundred lines of code, so you can read the whole thing if needed.

My preferred pattern looks something like this:

function doABunchOfCrazyAsyncStuff() {
  Step (
    function stepA() {
      a(arg1, arg2, arg3, this); // this is the callback, defined by Step
    }
    ,function stepB(err, data) {
      if(err) throw err; // causes error to percolate to the next step, all the way to the end.  same as calling "this(err, null); return;"
      b(data, arg2, arg3, this);
    }
    ,function stepC(err, data) {
      if(err) throw err;
      c(data, arg2, arg3, this);
    }
    ,function stepDEF(err, data) {
      if(err) throw err;
      d(data, this.parallel());
      e(data, this.parallel());
      f(data, this.parallel());
    }
    ,function stepGGG(err, dataD, dataE, dataF) {
      if(err) throw err;
      var combined = magick(dataD, dataE, dataF);
      var group = this.group();  // group() is how you get Step to merge multiple results into an array
      _.map(combined, function (element) {
        g(element, group()); 
      });
    }
    ,function stepPostprocess(err, results) {
      if(err) throw err;
      var processed = _.map(results, magick);
      return processed; // return is a convenient alternative to calling "this(null, result)"
    }
    ,cb // finally, the callback gets (err, result) from the previous function, and we are done
  );
}

Notes

• My example also uses the underscore library, "the tie to match JQuery's tux": http://documentcloud.github.com/underscore/
• Naming each step function stepXXXXX is a good habit so that the stack traces are clear and readable.
• Step lets you make powerful and elegant combinations of serial and parallel execution. These patterns are straightforward and comprehensible. If you need anything more complex like "when 3 of 5 of these methods completes, go to the next step", seriously RETHINK your design. do you really need such a complex pattern? (maybe you are waiting for a quorum set). Such a complex pattern deserves a function of it's own.

Answer 4

What you actually want is a deferred pattern though like futures.

function defer(f) {
    // create a promise.
    var promise = Futures.promise();
    f(function(err, data) {
        if (err) {
            // break it
            promise.smash(err);
        } else {
            // fulfill it
            promise.fulfill(data);
        }
    });
    return promise;
}
var da = defer(a), db = defer(b), dc = defer(c), dd = defer(d), de = defer(e), df = defer(f), dg = defer(g);

// when a and b are fulfilled then call ab
// ab takes one parameter [ra, rb]
Futures.join(da, db).when(ab);
Futures.join(db, dc).when(bc);
// abc takes one parameter [ra, rb, rc]
Futures.join(da, db, dc).when(abc);
Futures.join(db, dd).when(bd);
Futures.join(db, dc, dd).when(bcd);
Futures.join(da, df).when(af);
// where's e ?
Futures.join(df,dg).when(fg);
Futures.join(da,db,dc,dd,de,df,dg).fail(function() {
    console.log(":(");
});

Answer 5

nimble is another good choice.

Answer 6

A very simple barrier just for this: https://github.com/berb/node-barrierpoints