How can I eliminate duplicated Enum code?

Question

I have a large number of Enums that implement this interface:

/**
 * Interface for an enumeration, each element of which can be uniquely identified by its co         


        

Answer 1

In your specific case, the getCode() / getByCode(String code) methods seems very closed (euphemistically speaking) to the behaviour of the toString() / valueOf(String value) methods provided by all enumeration. Why don't you want to use them?

Answer 2

To tidy up dave's code:

public class CodeableEnumHelper {
    public static <E extends CodeableEnum> E getByCode(
        String code, E[] values
    ) {
        for (E e : values) {
            if (e.getCode().equalsIgnoreCase(code)) {
                return e;
            }
        }
        return null;
    }
}

public enum IMType implements CodableEnum {
    ...
    public IMType getByCode(String code) {
        return CodeableEnumHelper.getByCode(code, values());
    } 
}

Or more efficiently:

public class CodeableEnumHelper {
    public static <E extends CodeableEnum> Map<String,E> mapByCode(
        E[] values
    ) {
        Map<String,E> map = new HashMap<String,E>();
        for (E e : values) {
            map.put(e.getCode().toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT), value) {
        }
        return map;
    }
}

public enum IMType implements CodableEnum {
    ...
    private static final Map<String,IMType> byCode =
        CodeableEnumHelper.mapByCode(values());
    public IMType getByCode(String code) {
        return byCode.get(code.toLowerCase(Locale.ROOT));
    } 
}

Answer 3

It seems like you are actually implementing run time type information. Java provides this as a language feature.

I suggest you look up RTTI or reflection.

Answer 4

Abstract enums are potentially very useful (and currently not allowed). But a proposal and prototype exists if you'd like to lobby someone in Sun to add it:

http://freddy33.blogspot.com/2007/11/abstract-enum-ricky-carlson-way.html

Sun RFE:

http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6570766

Answer 5

Another solution would be not to put anything into the enum itself, and just provide a bi-directional map Enum <-> Code for each enum. You could e.g. use ImmutableBiMap from Google Collections for this.

That way there no duplicate code at all.

Example:

public enum MYENUM{
  VAL1,VAL2,VAL3;
}

/** Map MYENUM to its ID */
public static final ImmutableBiMap<MYENUM, Integer> MYENUM_TO_ID = 
new ImmutableBiMap.Builder<MYENUM, Integer>().
put(MYENUM.VAL1, 1).
put(MYENUM.VAL2, 2).
put(MYENUM.VAL3, 3).
build();

Answer 6

Unfortunately, I don't think that there is a way to do this. Your best bet would pro ably be to give up in emums altogether and use conventional class extension and static members. Otherwise, get used to duplicating that code. Sorry.