I love the HAML-like syntax of Jade\'s templating engine in Node.js, and I would love to use it client-side within Backbone.js.
I\'ve seen Backbone commonly using Un
You won't get the full power of Jade templates, but you can hack it a bit to get jade to properly output underscore templates, the key is preventing jade from escaping the <%>
tags with the !
operator, like so:
script#dieTemplate(type='text/template')
.die(class!='value-<%= value %>')
i.fa.fa-circle
i.fa.fa-circle
i.fa.fa-circle
i.fa.fa-circle
i.fa.fa-circle
i.fa.fa-circle
i.fa.fa-star
I just open sourced a nodejs project, called "asset-rack", that can can precompile jade templates and offer them in the browser as javascript functions.
This means that rendering is blazingly fast, even faster then micro-templates because there is no compilation step in the browser.
The architecture is a little different then what you mention, just one js file for all templates called "templates.js" or whatever you want.
You can check it out here, https://github.com/techpines/asset-rack#jadeasset
First you set it up on the server as follows:
new JadeAsset({
url: '/templates.js',
dirname: __dirname + '/templates'
});
If you template directory looked like this:
templates/
navbar.jade
user.jade
footer.jade
Then all your templates come into the browser under the variable "Templates":
$('body').append(Templates.navbar());
$('body').append(Templates.user({name: 'mike', occupation: 'sailor'});
$('body').append(Templates.footer());
Anyway, hope that helps.
I was able to run Jade client-side using jade-browser project.
Integration with Backbone is then simple: Instead of _template()
I'm using jade.compile()
.
HTML (scripts and template):
<script class="jsbin" src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.7.1.min.js"></script>
<script src="https://raw.github.com/weepy/jade-browser/master/jade.js"></script>
<script src="https://raw.github.com/weepy/jade-browser/master/jade-shim.js"></script>
<script src="http://documentcloud.github.com/underscore/underscore-min.js"></script>
<script src="http://documentcloud.github.com/backbone/backbone-min.js"></script>
<script type="template" id="test">
div.class1
div#id
| inner
div#nav
ul(style='color:red')
li #{item}
li #{item}
li #{item}
li #{item}
script
$('body').append('i am from script in jade')
</script>
JavaScript (integration with Backbone.View):
var jade = require("jade");
var TestView = Backbone.View.extend({
initialize: function() {
this.template = jade.compile($("#test").text());
},
render: function() {
var html = this.template({ item: 'hello, world'});
$('body').append(html);
}
});
var test = new TestView();
test.render();
HERE is the code.
As @dzejkej mentioned above, one of the best known ways to use Jade templates on the client is to use jade-browser; however, I've always had a few issues with Jade in the browser.
include
statements, you may have to do some extra work to get them to compile properly. In addition, if you decide to compile on the server and send JavaScript to the client, you still have issues. Whenever Jade templates use file includes, your compiled Jade templates can get rather large because they contain the same code over and over. For example, if you include the same file again and again, that file's contents will be downloaded to the browser several times, which is wasting bandwidth.{client: true}
compiler option, but the compiled templates are really not optimized for the client, and in addition, there is no mechanism for serving compiled Jade templates to the browser.These are among some of the reasons why I created the Blade project. Blade is a Jade-like templating language that supports client-side templates right out of the box. It even ships with Express middleware designed for serving compiled templates to the browser. If you are okay with a Jade-like alternative for your projects, check it out!
You might also checkout my new library for jade inside browser. It is as simple as < jade>...< /jade>. https://github.com/charlieamer/jade-query