I know strings in Erlang can be costly to use. So how do I convert \"5\"
to 5
?
Is there anything like io:format(\"~p\",[5])
tha
A string is a list:
9> integer_to_list(123).
"123"
As an aside if you ever need to deal with the string representation of floats you should look at the work that Bob Ippolito has done on mochinum.
The following is probably not the neatest way, but it works:
1> lists:flatten(io_lib:format("~p", [35365])).
"35365"
EDIT: I've found that the following function comes in useful:
%% string_format/2
%% Like io:format except it returns the evaluated string rather than write
%% it to standard output.
%% Parameters:
%% 1. format string similar to that used by io:format.
%% 2. list of values to supply to format string.
%% Returns:
%% Formatted string.
string_format(Pattern, Values) ->
lists:flatten(io_lib:format(Pattern, Values)).
EDIT 2 (in response to comments): the above function came from a small program I wrote a while back to learn Erlang. I was looking for a string-formatting function and found the behaviour of io_lib:format/2
within erl
counter-intuitive, for example:
1> io_lib:format("2 + 2 = ~p", [2+2]).
[50,32,43,32,50,32,61,32,"4"]
At the time, I was unaware of the 'auto-flattening' behaviour of output devices mentioned by @archaelus and so concluded that the above behaviour wasn't what I wanted.
This evening, I went back to this program and replaced calls to the string_format
function above with io_lib:format
. The only problems this caused were a few EUnit tests that failed because they were expecting a flattened string. These were easily fixed.
I agree with @gleber and @womble that using this function is overkill for converting an integer to a string. If that's all you need, use integer_to_list/1
. KISS!
There's also integer_to_list/1
, which does exactly what you want, without the ugliness.
lists:concat([Number]). also works.